Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:16:10.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The cosmic lithium problem and physics beyond the Standard Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2010

Karsten Jedamzik
Karsten Jedamzik*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Astroparticules, Université Montpellier II, place Eugne Bataillon 34095 Montpellier, FRANCE email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this proceeding I briefly discuss the possibility of relic decaying or annihilating particles to explain the cosmological 7Li anomaly and/or to be the source of significant amounts of pre-galactic 6Li. The effect of relic massive charged particles through catalysis of nuclear reactions is also discussed. The possibility of a connection of the 7Li problem to the cosmic dark matter and physics beyond the standard model of particle physics, such as supersymmetry, is noted.

Keywords

Cosmology: theoryearly universecosmological parameters
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S268: Light Elements in the Universe , November 2009 , pp. 27 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Asplund, M., Lambert, D. L., Nissen, P. E., Primas, F., & Smith, V. V. 2006, ApJ, 644, 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailly, S., Jedamzik, K., & Moultaka, G. 2009, Phys. Rev. D, 80, 63509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, C., Koopmans, K., & Pospelov, M. 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 78, 83010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cayrel, R. et al. , 2007, arXiv:0708.3819Google Scholar
Cyburt, R. H., Fields, B. D., & Olive, K. A. 2008 JCAP, 811, 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyburt, R. H. & Pospelov, M. 2009, arXiv:0906.4373Google Scholar
Dimopoulos, S., Esmailzadeh, R., Hall, L. J., & Starkman, G. D. 1988, ApJ, 330, 545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dmitriev, V. F., Flambaum, V. V., & Webb, J. K. 2004 Phys. Rev. D, 69, 63506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J. R., Olive, K. A., & Vangioni, E. 2005 Phys.Lett. B, 619, 30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jedamzik, K. 2000, Phys.Rev. Lett., 84, 3248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jedamzik, K. 2004, Phys.Rev. D, 70, 63524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jedamzik, K. 2004, Phys.Rev. D, 70, 83510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jedamzik, K., Choi, K. Y., Roszkowski., L., & Ruiz de Austri, R. 2006, JCAP, 607, 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jedamzik, K. & Pospelov, M. 2009 New J. Phys., 11, 105028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamimura, M., Kino, Y., & Hiyama, E. 2009, Prog. Theor. Phys., 121, 1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korn, A. J. et al. 2006, Nature 442, 657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pospelov, M. 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 231301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pospelov, M. 2007, arXiv:0712.0647Google Scholar
Richard, O., Michaud, G., & Richer, J. 2005 ApJ, 619, 538CrossRefGoogle Scholar