Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:25:14.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constraining jet physics in weakly accreting black holes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Sera Markoff*
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute “Anton Pannekoek”, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 403, 1098SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Outflowing jets are observed in a variety of astronomical objects such as accreting compact objects from X-ray binaries (XRBs) to active galactic nuclei (AGN), as well as at stellar birth and death. Yet we still do not know exactly what they are comprised of, why and how they form, or their exact relationship with the accretion flow. In this talk I focus on jets in black hole systems, which provide the ideal test population for studying the relationship between inflow and outflow over an extreme range in mass and accretion rate.

I present several recent results from coordinated multi-wavelength studies of low-luminosity sources. These results not only support similar trends in weakly accreting black hole behavior across the mass scale, but also suggest that the same underlying physical model can explain their broadband spectra. I discuss how comparisons between small- and large-scale systems are revealing new information about the regions nearest the black hole, providing clues about the creation of these weakest of jets. Furthermore, comparisons between our Galactic center nucleus Sgr A* and other sources at slightly higher accretion rates can elucidate the processes which drive central activity, and pave the way for new tests with upcoming instruments.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Beloborodov, A. M. 1999, ApJL, 510, L123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, G. C., Falcke, H., Herrnstein, R. M., et al. 2004, Science, 304, 704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, G. C., Goss, W. M., Falcke, H., et al. 2006, ApJL, 648, L127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbel, S., Fender, R. P., Tzioumis, A. K., et al. 2000, A&A, 359, 251Google Scholar
Corbel, S., Nowak, M., Fender, R. P., et al. 2003, A&A, 400, 1007Google Scholar
Falcke, H., Körding, E. & Markoff, S. 2004, A&A, 414, 895Google Scholar
Fender, R. P., Gallo, E. & Jonker, P. G. 2003, MNRAS, 343, L99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo, E., Fender, G. G. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, S., Sunyaev, R. A. 2003, MNRAS, 343, L59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, L. C. 1999, ApJ, 516, 672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körding, E., Falcke, H. & Corbel, S. 2006, A&A, 456, 439Google Scholar
Markoff, S. 2005, ApJL, 618, L103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markoff, S., Bower, G. C. & Falcke, H. 2007, MNRAS, submittedGoogle Scholar
Markoff, S., Nowak, M., Corbel, S., Fender, R. & Falcke, H. 2003, A&A, 397, 645Google Scholar
Markoff, S., Nowak, M. A. & Wilms, J. 2005, ApJ, submittedGoogle Scholar
McClintock, J. E., Remillard, R. A. 2006, in: Lewin, W. H. G. & Klis, M. van der (eds.), Compact Stellar X-ray Sources (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge), p. 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merloni, A., Heinz, S. & di Matteo, T. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merloni, A., Körding, E., Heinz, S., Markoff, S., et al. 2006, New Astronomy, 11, 567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migliari, S., Tomsick, J. A., Markoff, S., et al. 2007, ApJ, submittedGoogle Scholar
Russell, D. M., Fender, R. P., Hynes, R. I., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Z.-Q., Lo, K. Y., Liang, M.-C., Ho, P. T. P. & Zhao, J.-H. 2005, Nature, 438, 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. J., Nowak, M. A., Markoff, S., Marshall, H. L., et al. 2007, ApJ, submittedGoogle Scholar