Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:19:03.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A confined flare above filaments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2014

K. Dalmasse ,
R. Chandra ,
B. Schmieder  and
G. Aulanier
K. Dalmasse
Affiliation:
LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, UMPC, Univ. Paris Diderot, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92190 Meudon, France email: [email protected]
R. Chandra
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, DSB Campus, Kumaun University, Nainital - 263 002, India
B. Schmieder
Affiliation:
LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, UMPC, Univ. Paris Diderot, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92190 Meudon, France email: [email protected]
G. Aulanier
Affiliation:
LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, UMPC, Univ. Paris Diderot, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92190 Meudon, France email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present the dynamics of two filaments and a C-class flare observed in NOAA 11589 on 2012 October 16. We used the multi-wavelength high-resolution data from SDO, as well as THEMIS and ARIES ground-based observations. The observations show that the filaments are progressively converging towards each other without merging. We find that the filaments have opposite chirality which may have prevented them from merging. On October 16, a C3.3 class flare occurred without the eruption of the filaments. According to the standard solar flare model, after the reconnection, post-flare loops form below the erupting filaments whether the eruption fails or not. However, the observations show the formation of post-flare loops above the filaments, which is not consistent with the standard flare model. We analyze the topology of the active region's magnetic field by computing the quasi-separatrix layers (QSLs) using a linear force-free field extrapolation. We find a good agreement between the photospheric footprints of the QSLs and the flare ribbons. We discuss how slipping or slip-running reconnection at the QSLs may explain the observed dynamics.

Keywords

FilamentsflareMHD
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S300: Nature of Prominences and their role in Space Weather , June 2013 , pp. 227 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013 

References

Alissandrakis, C. E. 1981, A&A, 100, 197Google Scholar
Antiochos, S. K., Dahlburg, R. B., & Klimchuk, J. A. 1994, ApJ, 420, L41Google Scholar
Aulanier, G. & Démoulin, P. 1998, A&A, 329, 1125Google Scholar
Aulanier, G., Pariat, E., & Démoulin, P. 2005, A&A, 444, 961Google Scholar
Aulanier, G., Pariat, E., Démoulin, P., & DeVore, C. R. 2006, Solar Phys., 238, 347Google Scholar
Berlicki, A., Schmieder, B., Vilmer, N., Aulanier, G., & Del Zanna, G. 2004, A&A, 423, 1119Google Scholar
Chae, J., Wang, H., Qiu, J., Goode, P. R., Strous, L., & Yun, H. S. 2001, ApJ, 560, 476Google Scholar
Chandra, R.et al. 2006, Solar Phys., 239, 239Google Scholar
Démoulin, P. 2006, Adv. Sp. Res., 37, 1269Google Scholar
Démoulin, P., Henoux, J. C., Priest, E. R., & Mandrini, C. H. 1996, A&A, 308, 643Google Scholar
DeVore, C. R., Antiochos, S. K., & Aulanier, G. 2005, ApJ, 629, 1122Google Scholar
Mandrini, C. H.et al. 1997, Solar Phys., 174, 229Google Scholar
Martens, P. C. & Zwaan, C. 2001, ApJ, 558, 872Google Scholar
Masson, S., Pariat, E., Aulanier, G., & Schrijver, C. J. 2009, ApJ, 700, 559Google Scholar
Moore, R. L., Sterling, A. C., Hudson, H. S., & Lemen, J. R. 2001, ApJ, 552, 833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pariat, E., Aulanier, G.et al. 2004, ApJ, 614, 1099Google Scholar
Pariat, E. & Démoulin, P. 2012, A&A, 541, A78Google Scholar
Schmieder, B., Aulanier, G., Démoulin, P.et al. 1997, A&A, 325, 1213Google Scholar
Schmieder, B., Aulanier, G., Mein, P. & López Ariste, A. 2006, Solar Phys., 238, 245Google Scholar
Schmieder, B., Mein, N.et al. 2004, Solar Phys., 223, 119Google Scholar
Shibata, K. & Magara, T. 2011, Living Reviews in Solar Phys., 8, 6Google Scholar
Titov, V. S., Hornig, G., & Démoulin, P. 2002, Journal of Geophysical Research, 107, 1164Google Scholar
Török, T. & Kliem, B. 2005, ApJ, 630, L97Google Scholar
van Ballegooijen, A. A. & Martens, P. C. H. 1989, ApJ, 343, 971Google Scholar