Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T10:29:24.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combining asteroseismology and spectroscopy for obtaining precise abundances: CoRoT-GES and K2-RAVE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2018

M. Valentini Open the ORCID record for M. Valentini [Opens in a new window]  and
CoRoT-GES and K2-RAVE collaborations
M. Valentini
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany email: [email protected]
CoRoT-GES and K2-RAVE collaborations
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The spectroscopic analysis of red giant stars is hampered by difficulties in determining the surface gravity, log g. The presence of degeneracies, few lines sensitive to log g, limited spectral coverage and bad signal-to-noise, can affect the precision and accuracy of log g and, as a consequence, the quality of the element abundances. We show how the adoption of the seismic surface gravity can improve the spectroscopic analysis of red giants. As examples, we adopted the seismic gravity in the analysis of spectra taken by two different surveys: GES (high resolution) and RAVE (intermediate resolution). The results of this technique were the lifting of the log g-Teff degeneracy and more accurate and precise atmospheric parameters and abundances.

Keywords

stars: fundamental parametersstars: abundancessurveys
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 13 , Symposium S334: Rediscovering our Galaxy , July 2017 , pp. 162 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Boeche, C. & Grebel, E. K., 2016, A&A, 587, A2Google Scholar
Davies, G. R. & Miglio, A., 2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 774Google Scholar
de Jong, R. S., Barden, S. C., & Bellido-Tirado, O., et al., 2016, SPIE, 9908, 99081OGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, G., Randich, S., Asplund, M., et al., 2012, The Messenger, 147, 25Google Scholar
Kunder, A., Kordopatis, G., Steinmetz, M., et al., 2017, AJ, 153, 75Google Scholar
Minchev, I., Chiappini, C., & Martig, M., 2014, A&A, 572, A92Google Scholar
Morel, T. & Miglio, A., 2012, MNRAS, 419, L34Google Scholar
Rodrigues, T. S., Girardi, L., Miglio, A., et al., 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2758Google Scholar
Rodrigues, T. S., Bossini, D., Miglio, A., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 467, 1433Google Scholar
Ruchti, G. R., Fulbright, J. P., & Wyse, R. F. G., et al., 2011, APJ, 743, 107Google Scholar
Valentini, M., Morel, T., Miglio, A., Fossati, L., & Munari, U., 2013, EPJWC, 43, 03006Google Scholar
Valentini, M., Chiappini, C., Miglio, A., et al., 2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 970Google Scholar
Valentini, M., Chiappini, C., Davies, G. R., et al., 2017, A&A, 600, A66Google Scholar