Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T10:08:45.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The collision between the Milky Way and Andromeda and the fate of their Supermassive Black Holes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Riccardo Schiavi
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Università La Sapienza, Roma, 00185, Italy email: [email protected]
Roberto Capuzzo-Dolcetta
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Università La Sapienza, Roma, 00185, Italy email: [email protected]
Manuel Arca Sedda
Affiliation:
ARI, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69117, Germany
Mario Spera
Affiliation:
Dep. of Physics and Astronomy, Università di Padova, Italy Dep. of Physics and Astronomy, CIERA-Northwestern University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Our Galaxy and the nearby Andromeda Galaxy (M31) form a bound system, even though the relative velocity vector of M31 is currently not well constrained. Their orbital motion is highly dependent on the initial conditions, but all the reliable scenarios imply a first close approach in the next 3–5 Gyrs. In our study, we simulate this interaction via direct N-body integration, using the HiGPUs code. Our aim is to investigate the dependence of the time of the merger on the physical and dynamical properties of the system. Finally, we study the dynamical evolution of the two Supermassive Black Holes placed in the two galactic centers, with the future aim to achieve a proper resolution to follow their motion until they form a tight binary system.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R.et al. 2013, Journ. of Comp. Phys., v. 236, p. 580593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binney, J. & Tremaine, S. 1987, Galactic Dynamics, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Cox, T. J. & Loeb, A. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 461474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Marel, R. P.et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomon, J. B.et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 4432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Marel, R. P.et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teuben, P. 1995, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, 77, 398401Google Scholar
Shull, J. M. 2014, ApJ, 784, 142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raychaudury, S. & Lynden-Bell, D. 1989, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., 240, 195218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widrow, L. M. & Dubinski, J. 2005, ApJ, 631, 838855CrossRefGoogle Scholar