Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:10:42.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CMB anisotropy science: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2013

Anthony Challinor
Anthony Challinor*
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy and Kavli Institute for Cosmology Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, U.K.DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge, CB3 0WA, U.K. email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The cosmic microwave background (CMB) provides us with our most direct observational window to the early universe. Observations of the temperature and polarization anisotropies in the CMB have played a critical role in defining the now-standard cosmological model. In this contribution we review some of the basics of CMB science, highlighting the role of observations made with ground-based and balloon-borne Antarctic telescopes. Most of the ingredients of the standard cosmological model are poorly understood in terms of fundamental physics. We discuss how current and future CMB observations can address some of these issues, focusing on two directly relevant for Antarctic programmes: searching for gravitational waves from inflation via B-mode polarization, and mapping dark matter through CMB lensing.

Keywords

cosmology: cosmic microwave background
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S288: Astrophysics from Antarctica , August 2012 , pp. 42 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Bischoff, C.et al., 2008, ApJ, 684, 771Google Scholar
Bock, J.et al., 2009, ArXiv e-prints 0906.1188Google Scholar
Bock, J.et al., 2008, ArXiv e-prints 0805.4207Google Scholar
Brown, M. L.et al., 2009, ApJ, 705, 978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Challinor, A. & Peiris, H., 2009, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 1132, Novello M., Perez S., eds., pp. 86–140Google Scholar
Chiang, H. C.et al., 2010, ApJ, 711, 1123Google Scholar
Das, S.et al., 2011, Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 021301Google Scholar
de Bernardis, P.et al., 2000, Nature, 404, 955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efstathiou, G. & Gratton, S., 2009, JCAP, 6, 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, D. J.et al., 2005, ApJ, 633, 560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filippini, J. P.et al., 2010, in SPIE Conference Series, Vol. 7741, Holland W. S., Zmuidzinas J., eds., pp. 77411N–77411N-12Google Scholar
Hu, W., 2008, ArXiv e-prints 0802.3688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, W. & Okamoto, T., 2002, ApJ, 574, 566Google Scholar
Kamionkowski, M., Kosowsky, A., & Stebbins, A., 1997, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 2058Google Scholar
Keating, B. G., O'Dell, C. W., de Oliveira-Costa, A., Klawikowski, S., Stebor, N., Piccirillo, L., Tegmark, M., & Timbie, P. T., 2001, ApJ. Lett., 560, L1Google Scholar
Keisler, R.et al., 2011, ApJ, 743, 28Google Scholar
Komatsu, E.et al., 2011, ApJS, 192, 18Google Scholar
Kovac, J. M., Leitch, E. M., Pryke, C., Carlstrom, J. E., Halverson, N. W., & Holzapfel, W. L., 2002, Nature, 420, 772Google Scholar
Larson, D.et al., 2011, ApJS, 192, 16Google Scholar
Leitch, E. M., Kovac, J. M., Halverson, N. W., Carlstrom, J. E., Pryke, C., Smith, M. W. E., 2005, ApJ, 624, 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, A. & Challinor, A., 2006, Phys. Rep., 429, 1Google Scholar
McMahon, J. J.et al., 2009, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 1185, Young, B., Cabrera, B., Miller, A., eds., pp. 511–514Google Scholar
Montroy, T. E.et al., 2006, ApJ, 647, 813Google Scholar
Niemack, M. D.et al., 2010, in SPIE Conference Series, Vol. 7741, Holland W. S., Zmuidzinas J., eds., pp. 77411S–77411S-21Google Scholar
Piacentini, F.et al., 2006, ApJ, 647, 833Google Scholar
QUIET Collaboration, 2012, ArXiv e-prints 1207.5034Google Scholar
QUIET Collaboration, 2011, ApJ, 741, 111Google Scholar
Seljak, U. & Hirata, C. M., 2004, Phys. Rev. D, 69, 043005Google Scholar
Seljak, U. & Zaldarriaga, M., 1997, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 2054Google Scholar
Sievers, J. L.et al., 2007, ApJ, 660, 976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smoot, G. F.et al., 1992, ApJ. Lett., 396, L1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starobinskii, A. A., 1979, JETP Lett., 30, 682Google Scholar
The COrE Collaboration, 2011, ArXiv e-prints 1102.2181Google Scholar
The Planck Collaboration, 2006, ArXiv e-prints astro-ph/0604069Google Scholar
van Engelen, A.et al., 2012, ApJ, 756, 142Google Scholar