Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:56:22.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cloud-scale Analyses on Molecular Gas in Simulated and Observed Galaxy Mergers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2023

Hao He*
Affiliation:
McMaster University 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, CAN
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We employ the Feedback In Realistic Environments (FIRE-2) physics model to study how the properties of giant molecular clouds (GMCs) evolve during galaxy mergers. Due to the rarity of mergers in the local Universe, samples of nearby merging galaxies suitable for studies of individual GMCs are limited. Idealized simulations provide us with a new window to study GMC evolution during a merger, and assist in interpreting observations. We conduct a pixel-by-pixel analysis of the simulated molecular gas properties in both undisturbed control galaxies and galaxy mergers. The simulated GMC-pixels follow a similar trend in a diagram of velocity dispersion (σv) versus gas surface density (Σmol) as observed in normal spiral galaxies in the Physics at High Angular resolution in Nearby GalaxieS (PHANGS) survey. For simulated mergers, we see a significant increase in both the Σmol and σv for GMC-pixels by a factor of 5 – 10, which put these pixels to be above the trend of PHANGS galaxies in the σv vs Σmol diagram. This deviation indicates that GMCs in the simulated merger are more gravitationally unbound and have higher virial parameter (αvir) of 10 – 100, which is much larger than that of simulated control galaxies. Furthermore, we find that the increase in αvir generally happens at the same time as the increase in global star formation rate (SFR), which suggests feedback is playing a role in dispersing the gas. The correspondence between high αvir and SFR also suggests some other physical mechanisms besides self-gravity are helping the GMCs in starburst mergers to collapse and form stars.

Type
Contributed Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Brunetti, N., Wilson, C.D., Sliwa, K. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 4730 10.1093/mnras/staa3425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunetti, N. 2022, thesisGoogle Scholar
Feldmann, R., Quataert, E., Faucher-Gigu‘ere, C.-A., et al. 2022, 2022arXiv220515325FGoogle Scholar
Leroy, A. K., Hughes, A., Schruba, A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 16 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroy, A. K., Schinnerer, E., Hughes, A., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 43 10.3847/1538-4365/ac17f3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H., Vogelsberger, M., Bryan, G. L., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 265 10.1093/mnras/stac1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, J., Torrey, P. Ellison, S., 2019, MNRAS, 485, 132010.1093/mnras/stz417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieten, C., Neininger, N., Gu’elin, M., et al. 2006, A&A, 453, 459 Google Scholar
Renaud, F., Bournaud, F., Agertz, O., et al. 2019a, A&A, 625, A65 Google Scholar
Saintonge, A., Catinella, B., Tacconi, L. J., et al. 2017, APJS, 233, 220 10.3847/1538-4365/aa97e0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, J., Leroy, A. K., Schruba, A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 172 10.3847/1538-4357/aac326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, J., Leroy, A. K., Schinnerer, E., et al. 2020, ApJL, 901, L810.3847/2041-8213/abb3beCrossRefGoogle Scholar