Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:35:15.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The “Christmas burst” GRB 101225A revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2015

C. C. Thöne
Affiliation:
IAA - CSIC, Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, 18008, Granada, Spain email: [email protected]
A. de Ugarte Postigo
Affiliation:
IAA - CSIC, Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, 18008, Granada, Spain email: [email protected] Dark Cosmology Center, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
C. L. Fryer
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
D. A. Kann
Affiliation:
Thüringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg, Sternwarte 5, D-07778 Tautenburg, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Long GRBs are related to the death of massive stars and reveal themselves through synchrotron emission from highly relativistic jets. The ‘Christmas Burst’ GRB 101225A was an exceptionally long GRB with a thermal afterglow, very different from the standard GRB. Initially, no spectroscopic redshift could be obtained and SED modeling yielded z=0.33. A plausible model was a He-NS star merger where the He-star had ejected part of its envelope in the common envelope phase during inspiral. The interaction between the jet and the previously ejected shell can explains the thermal emission. We obtained deep spectroscopy of the host galaxy which leads to a correction of the redshift to z=0.847. Despite the higher redshift, our model is still valid and theoretically better justified than the alternative suggestion of a blue supergiant progenitor proposed by Levan et al. (2014) for several “ultra-long” GRBs.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Cuesta Martinez, C. F., Aloy, M. A., & Mimica, P. 2015a, MNRAS, 446, 1716Google Scholar
Cuesta Martinez, C. F.et al. 2015b, MNRAS, 446, 1737Google Scholar
Fryer, C. L.et al. 2013, ApJ, 764, 181Google Scholar
Gendre, B.et al. 2013, ApJ, 766, 30Google Scholar
Levan, A.et al. 2014, ApJ, 781, 13Google Scholar
Starling, R. L. C.et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 2950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thöne, C., et al. 2011, Nature, 480, 72Google Scholar
Woosley, S. E. & Heger, A. 2012, ApJ, 752, 32Google Scholar
Zhang, W. & Fryer, C. L. 2011, ApJ, 550, 357Google Scholar