Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:19:32.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical evolution of r-process elements in the Draco dwarf spheroidal galaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2016

M. N. Ishigaki
Affiliation:
Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, University of Tokyo 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, 277-8583, Japan email: [email protected]
T. Tsujimoto
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan email: [email protected]
T. Shigeyama
Affiliation:
Research center for the early universe, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan email: [email protected]
W. Aoki
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A dominant astrophysical site for r-process, which is responsible for producing heavy neutron-capture elements, is unknown. Dwarf spheroidal galaxies around the Milky Way halo provide ideal laboratories to investigate the origin and evolution of r-process elements. We carried out high-resolution spectroscopic observations of three giant stars in the Draco dwarf spheroidal galaxy to estimate their europium abundances. We found that the upper-limits of [Eu/H] are very low in the range [Fe/H] < −2, while this ratio is nearly constant at higher metallicities. This trend is not well reproduced with models which assume that Eu is produced together with Fe by SNe, and may suggest the contribution from other objects such as neutron-star mergers.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Cohen, J. & Huang, W. 2009, ApJ, 701, 1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulbright, J. P., Rich, R. M., & Castro, S. 2004, ApJ, 612, 447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E., Cohen, J. G., & Smith, G. H., et al. 2011, ApJ, 727, 79Google Scholar
Noguchi, K., Aoki, W., Kawanomoto, S., et al. 2002, PASJ, 54, 855Google Scholar
Roederer, I. U., Cowan, J. J., & Preston, G. W., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shetrone, M. D., Côté, P., & Sargent, W. L. W. 2001, ApJ, 548, 592Google Scholar
Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J., & Gallino, R. 2008, ARAA, 46, 241Google Scholar
Tsujimoto, T. & Shigeyama, T. 2014, A&A, 565, L5Google Scholar
Tsujimoto, T., Ishigaki, M. N., Shigeyama, T., & Aoki, W. 2015, PASJ, 67, L3Google Scholar
Wanajo, S. & Ishimaru, Y. 2006, Nuclear Physics A, 777, 676CrossRefGoogle Scholar