Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:32:08.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chandra and VLA Observations of Supermassive Black Hole Outbursts in M87

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2013

William Forman ,
C. Jones  and
Eugene Churazov
William Forman
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MAUSA email: [email protected], [email protected]
C. Jones
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MAUSA email: [email protected], [email protected]
Eugene Churazov
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Garching Germany Institute for Space Research, Moscow, Russia email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We discuss the effects of supermassive black hole (SMBH) outbursts on the hot atmospheres surrounding the central massive galaxies in groups and clusters, as observed with X-ray and radio observations. We focus on a detailed study of the supermassive black hole in M87 at the center of the Virgo cluster using Chandra and VLA observations. We summarize the outburst history and describe the clearly observed energy input from buoyant bubbles of relativistic plasma produced by the central SMBH, uplifted filaments of X-ray emitting gas, and the Mach 1.2 shock together balance the energy lost as gas radiatively cools.

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: individual (M87)galaxies: activegalaxies: evolution
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S295: The intriguing life of massive galaxies , August 2012 , pp. 261 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013 

References

Acciari, et al. 2010, ApJ, 716 819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, R.et al. 1993, MNRAS, 370, 645Google Scholar
Churazov, E., Brueggen, M.Kaiser, C., Boehringer, H., & Forman, W. 2001, ApJ, 554, 261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croton, D.et al. 1995, MNRAS, 365, 11Google Scholar
Forman, W.et al. 1978 1978, ApJS, 38, 357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebhardt, K.et al. 2011, ApJ, 729, 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Q.et al. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 101Google Scholar
Harris, D.et al. 2006, ApJ, 640, 211Google Scholar
Hines, D., Eilek, J., & Owen, F. 1989, ApJ, 347, 713Google Scholar
Johnson, R. 2011, Ph.D. Thesis, Dartmouth College, Publication number: AAT 3477679Google Scholar
Markevitch, M. & Vikhlinin, A. 2007, Phy. Rev, 443, 1Google Scholar
Markevitch, M., Vikhlinin, A., & Forman, W. 2003, ASPC 301, 37Google Scholar
Marshall, H.et al. 2002, ApJ, 564, 683Google Scholar
Million, E.et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 2046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, F. Eilek, J., & Kassim, N. 2000, ApJ, 543, 611Google Scholar
Randall, S.et al. 2008, ApJ, 688, 208Google Scholar
Shi, Y., Rieke, G., Hines, D., Gordon, K., & Egami, E. 2007, ApJ 655, 781Google Scholar
Simionescu, A.et al. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 91Google Scholar
Stewart, G., Canizares, C., Fabian, A., & Nulsen, P. 1984, ApJ, 278, 536CrossRefGoogle Scholar