Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:25:38.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can the Dustiest Main Sequence Stars Tell Us About the Rocky Planet Formation Process?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

Carl Melis
Carl Melis*
Affiliation:
Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego, California 92093-0424, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Main sequence stars hosting extreme quantities of inner planetary system debris are likely experiencing transient dust production events. The nature of these events, if they can be unambiguously attributed to a single process, can potentially inform us on the formation and/or early evolution of rocky Earth-like planets. In this contribution I examine some of the dustiest main sequence stars known and three processes that may be capable of reproducing their observed properties. Through this activity I also make an estimate for the likelihood of an A-type star to have an asteroid belt-like planetesimal population.

Keywords

planets and satellites: formationcircumstellar matterplanetary systems
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 10 , Issue S314: Young Stars & Planets Near the Sun , November 2015 , pp. 241 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Agnor, C. & Asphaug, E. 2004, ApJL, 613, L157Google Scholar
Agnor, C. B., Canup, R. M., & Levison, H. F. 1999, Icarus, 142, 219Google Scholar
Asphaug, E., Agnor, C. B., & Williams, Q. 2006, Nature, 439, 155Google Scholar
Bonsor, A., Raymond, S. N., & Augereau, J.-C. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 2938Google Scholar
Bonsor, A., Raymond, S. N., Augereau, J.-C., & Ormel, C. W. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2380Google Scholar
Bottke, W. F., Levison, H. F., Nesvorný, D., & Dones, L. 2007, Icarus, 190, 203Google Scholar
Burke, C. J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 809, 8Google Scholar
Day, J. M. D., Walker, R. J., Qin, L., & Rumble, D. III 2012, Nature Geoscience, 5, 614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujiwara, H., et al. 2009, ApJL, 695, L88Google Scholar
Fujiwara, H., et al. 2012, ApJL, 749, L29Google Scholar
Genda, H., Kobayashi, H., & Kokubo, E. 2015, ArXiv e-printsGoogle Scholar
Gomes, R., Levison, H. F., Tsiganis, K., & Morbidelli, A. 2005, Nature, 435, 466Google Scholar
Jackson, A. P. & Wyatt, M. C. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 657Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. M. & Wyatt, M. C. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3164Google Scholar
Kenyon, S. J. & Bromley, B. C. 2006, AJ, 131, 1837Google Scholar
Kral, Q., Thébault, P., & Charnoz, S. 2013, A&A, 558, A121Google Scholar
Marchi, S., et al. 2013, Nature Geoscience, 6, 303Google Scholar
Melis, C., Zuckerman, B., Rhee, J. H., & Song, I. 2010, ApJL, 717, L57Google Scholar
Melis, C., Zuckerman, B., Rhee, J. H., Song, I., Murphy, S. J., & Bessell, M. S. 2012, Nature, 487, 74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melis, C., Zuckerman, B., Rhee, J. H., Song, I., Murphy, S. J., & Bessell, M. S. 2013, ApJ, 778, 12Google Scholar
Melis, C., Zuckerman, B., Rhee, J. H., Song, I., Murphy, S. J., & Bessell, M. S. 2014, in IAU Symposium, edited by Haghighipour, N., vol. 293 of IAU Symposium, 273–277Google Scholar
Meng, H. Y. A., et al. 2014, Science, 345, 1032Google Scholar
Meng, H. Y. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 805, 77Google Scholar
Meyer, M. R., et al. 2008, ApJL, 673, L181Google Scholar
Morales, F. Y., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 1067Google Scholar
Morbidelli, A., Levison, H. F., Tsiganis, K., & Gomes, R. 2005, Nature, 435, 462Google Scholar
Olofsson, J., Juhász, A., Henning, T., Mutschke, H., Tamanai, A., Moór, A. & Ábrahám, P. 2012, A&A, 542, A90Google Scholar
Rhee, J. H., Song, I., & Zuckerman, B. 2007, ApJ, 671, 616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhee, J. H., Song, I., & Zuckerman, B. 2008, ApJ, 675, 777Google Scholar
Rieke, G. H., et al. 2005, ApJ, 620, 1010Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. E., Warren, P. H., & Yin, Q.-Z. 2012, ApJ, 752, 8Google Scholar
Schneider, A., Song, I., Melis, C., Zuckerman, B., Bessell, M., Hufford, T., & Hinkley, S. 2013, ApJ, 777, 78Google Scholar
Song, I., Zuckerman, B., Weinberger, A. J., & Becklin, E. E. 2005, Nature, 436, 363Google Scholar
Stark, C. C. & Kuchner, M. J. 2009, ApJ, 707, 543Google Scholar
Stewart, S. T. & Leinhardt, Z. M. 2012, ApJ, 751, 32Google Scholar
Su, K. Y. L., et al. 2006, ApJ, 653, 675Google Scholar
Tsiganis, K., Gomes, R., Morbidelli, A., & Levison, H. F. 2005, Nature, 435, 459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, M. C. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 339Google Scholar
Zuckerman, B., Koester, D., Reid, I. N., & Hünsch, M. 2003, ApJ, 596, 477Google Scholar
Zuckerman, B., Melis, C., Klein, B., Koester, D., & Jura, M. 2010, ApJ, 722, 725Google Scholar
Zuckerman, B., Melis, C., Rhee, J. H., Schneider, A., & Song, I. 2012, ApJ, 752, 58Google Scholar