Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:54:29.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bulges vs elliptical galaxies: some clues from their formation in a cosmological context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2007

R. Domínguez-Tenreiro ,
F. J. Martínez-Serrano ,
A. Serna ,
M. Mollá  and
J. Oñorbe
R. Domínguez-Tenreiro
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical Physics, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain email: [email protected]
F. J. Martínez-Serrano
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and C.A., Universidad Miguel Hernández, 03206 Elche, Spain
A. Serna
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and C.A., Universidad Miguel Hernández, 03206 Elche, Spain
M. Mollá
Affiliation:
Department of Fundamental Research, CIEMAT, 28040 Madrid, Spain
J. Oñorbe
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical Physics, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We report on an extension, through cosmological simulations, of the two-phase formation scenario for elliptical galaxies to classical spiral bulges. In particular, we analyze the possibility that the old stellar population of bulges forms in a fast phase, while the younger stellar component forms or is assembled in a slow phase, in part from disk material suffering instabilities and in part through satellite capture or mergers.

Keywords

methods: hydrodynamicsgalaxies: formationgalaxies: bulgesstars: formation
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S245: Formation and Evolution of Galaxy Bulges , July 2007 , pp. 71 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Athanassoula, E. 2005, MNRAS 358, 1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carollo, C. M., Scarlata, C., Stiavelli, M., Wyse, R. F. G., & Mayer, L. 2007, ApJ 658, 960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez-Tenreiro, R., Sáiz, A., & Serna, A. 2004, ApJ 611, L5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez-Tenreiro, R., Oñorbe, J., Sáiz, A., Artal, H., Serna, A. 2006, ApJ 636, L77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drory, N. & Fisher, D-B. 2007, ApJ 664, 640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggen, O.J., Lynden-Bell, D., & Sandage, A. 1962, ApJ 136, 749Google Scholar
Eliche-Moral, M. C., Balcells, M., Aguerri, J. & González-García, A. C. 2006, A&A 457, 91Google Scholar
Ellis, R. S., Abraham, R. G. & Dickinson, M. E. 2001, ApJ 551, 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreras, I., Wyse, R. F. G. & Silk, J. 2003, MNRAS 345, 1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, P., Gorgas, J. & Goudfrooij, P. 2007, A&A in pressGoogle Scholar
Keres, D., Katz, N., Weinberg, D., & Davé, R. 2005, MNRAS 363, 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendy, J. & Kennicutt, R. C. 2004, ARAA 42, 603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollá, M., Ferrini, F. & Gozzi, G. 2000, MNRAS 316, 345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oñorbe, J., Domínguez-Tenreiro, R., Sáiz, A., Serna, A., & Artal, H. 2005, ApJ 632, L570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvador-Solé, E., Manrique, A., & Solanes, J. M. 2005, MNRAS 358, 901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serna, A., Domínguez-Tenreiro, R. & Sáiz, A. 2003, ApJ 597, 878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D., Greggio, L. & Bender, R. 1999, MNRAS 302, 537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, R. H. et al. 2002, ApJ 568, 52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyse, R. F. G., Gilmore, G. & Franx, M. 1997, ARAA 35, 637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, D. H., Mo, H. J., Jing, Y. P., & Borner, G. 2003, MNRAS 339, 127Google Scholar