Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:54:10.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Breaking down the link between luminous and dark matter in massive galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Sébastien Foucaud
Affiliation:
National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan email: [email protected]
Christopher J. Conselice
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, UK email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a study on the clustering of a stellar mass selected sample of galaxies with stellar masses M* > 1010M at redshifts 0.4 < z < 2.0, taken from the Palomar Observatory Wide-field Infrared Survey. We examine the clustering properties of these stellar mass selected samples as a function of redshift and stellar mass, and find that galaxies with high stellar masses have a progressively higher clustering strength than galaxies with lower stellar masses. We also find that galaxies within a fixed stellar mass range have a higher clustering strength at higher redshifts. We further estimate the average total masses of the dark matter haloes hosting these stellar-mass selected galaxies. For all galaxies in our sample the stellar-mass-to-total-mass ratio is always lower than the universal baryonic mass fraction and the stellar-mass-to-total-mass ratio is strongly correlated with the halo masses for central galaxies, such that more massive haloes contain a lower fraction of their mass in the form of stars. The remaining baryonic mass is included partially in stars within satellite galaxies in these haloes, and as diffuse hot and warm gas. We also find that, at a fixed stellar mass, the stellar-to-total-mass ratio increases at lower redshifts. This suggests that galaxies at a fixed stellar mass form later in lower mass dark matter haloes, and earlier in massive haloes. We interpret this as a ‘halo downsizing’ effect.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Bruzual, & Charlot, 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundy, , Ellis, & Conselice, 2005, ApJ, 625, 621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundy, , Ellis, , Conselice, et al. 2006, ApJ, 651, 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coil, , Newman, , Kaiser, et al. 2004, ApJ, 617, 765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, , Norberg, , Baugh, et al. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conselice, , Bundy, , Ellis, et al. 2005, ApJ, 628, 160Google Scholar
Conselice, , Bundy, , Trujillo, et al. 2007, MNRAS, 381, 962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conselice, , Bundy, U et al. 2008, MNRAS, 383, 1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, & Barger, 2008, ApJ, 686, 72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, , Faber, , Newman, et al. 2003, SPIE, 4834, 161Google Scholar
Davis, , Guhathakurta, , Konidaris, et al. 2007, ApJ, 660, L1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drory, & Alvarez, 2008, ApJ, 680, 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucaud, , Conselice, , Hartley, et al. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 147Google Scholar
Gonzalez, , Zaritsky, & Zabludoff, 2007, ApJ, 666, 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komatsu, , Dunkley, , Nolta, et al. 2009, ApJS, 180, 330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landy, & Szalay, 1993, ApJ, 412, 64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magliocchetti, & Maddox, 1999, MNRAS, 306, 988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, , Seljak, , Kauffmann, et al. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meneux, , Guzzo, , Garilli, et al. 2008, A&A, 478, 299Google Scholar
Mo, & White, 2002, MNRAS, 336, 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neistein, , vanAAAAdenAAAABosch, , & Dekel, 2006, MNRAS, 372, 933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
vanAAAAStarkenburg, , vanAAAAderAAAAWerf, , Franx, et al. 2008, A&A, 488, 99Google Scholar
Weinmann, , vanAAAAdenAAAABosch, , & Yang, , Mo, 2006, MNRAS, 366, 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar