Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:34:55.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Black-Hole Formation in Potential γ-Ray Burst Progenitors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Evan O'Connor
Affiliation:
TAPIR, California Institute of Technology email: [email protected]@tapir.caltech.edu
Luc Dessart
Affiliation:
TAPIR, California Institute of Technology email: [email protected]@tapir.caltech.edu Laboratorie d'Astrophysique de Marseille, Universitè Aix-Marseille & CNRS email: [email protected]
Christian D. Ott
Affiliation:
TAPIR, California Institute of Technology email: [email protected]@tapir.caltech.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present the results of a study by Dessart et al. (2012), where we performed stellar collapse simulations of proposed long-duration γ-ray burst (LGRB) progenitor models and assessed the prospects for black hole formation. We find that many of the proposed LGRB candidates in Woosley & Heger (2006) have core structures similar to garden-variety core-collapse supernova progenitors and thus are not expected to form black holes, which is a key ingredient of the collapsar model of LGRBs. The small fraction of proposed progenitors that are compact enough to form black holes have fast rotating iron cores, making them prone to a magneto-rotational explosion and the formation of a proto-magnetar rather than a black hole. This leads us to our take-home message, that one must consider the iron-core structure (eg. ρ(r), Ω(r)) of evolved massive stars before making assumptions on the central engine of LGRBs.

Type
Poster Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Dessart, L., Burrows, A., Livne, E., & Ott, C. D. 2008, Astrophys. J. Lett., 673 L43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dessart, L., O'Connor, E., & Ott, C. D. 2012, submitted to Astrophys. J., arXiv:1203:1926Google Scholar
Metzger, B. D., Giannios, D., Thompson, T. A., Bucciantini, N., & Quataert, E. 2011, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 413 2031Google Scholar
O'Connor, E. & Ott, C. D. 2010, Class. Quantum Grav., 27 114103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, E. & Ott, C. D. 2011, Astrophys. J., 730 70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, J. C., Yi, L., Höflich, P., & Wang, L. 2000, Astrophys. J., 537 810Google Scholar
Woosley, S. 1993, Astrophys. J., 405 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woosley, S. & Heger, A. 2006, Astrophys. J., 637 914Google Scholar
Woosley, S. & Heger, A. 2007, Phys. Rep., 442 269CrossRefGoogle Scholar