Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:38:25.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are the photospheric sunspots magnetically force-free in nature?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2011

Sanjiv Kumar Tiwari*
Affiliation:
Udaipur Solar Observatory, Physical Research Laboratory, Dewali, Bari Road, Udaipur - 313 001, India. email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a force-free magnetic field, there is no interaction of field and the plasma in the surrounding atmosphere i.e., electric currents are aligned with the magnetic field, giving rise to zero Lorentz force. The computation of many magnetic parameters like magnetic energy, gradient of twist of sunspot magnetic fields (computed from the force-free parameter α), including any kind of extrapolations heavily hinge on the force-free approximation of the photospheric magnetic fields. The force-free magnetic behaviour of the photospheric sunspot fields has been examined by Metcalf et al. (1995) and Moon et al. (2002) ending with inconsistent results. Metcalf et al. (1995) concluded that the photospheric magnetic fields are far from the force-free nature whereas Moon et al. (2002) found the that the photospheric magnetic fields are not so far from the force-free nature as conventionally regarded. The accurate photospheric vector field measurements with high resolution are needed to examine the force-free nature of sunspots. We use high resolution vector magnetograms obtained from the Solar Optical Telescope/Spectro-Polarimeter (SOT/SP) aboard Hinode to inspect the force-free behaviour of the photospheric sunspot magnetic fields. Both the necessary and sufficient conditions for force-freeness are examined by checking global as well as as local nature of sunspot magnetic fields. We find that the sunspot magnetic fields are very close to the force-free approximation, although they are not completely force-free on the photosphere.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Amari, T., Boulmezaoud, T. Z., & Aly, J. J. 2006, Astron. Astrophys, 446, 691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. 1961, Chapter-2: Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability (International Series of Monographs on Physics, Oxford: Clarendon, 1961)Google Scholar
De Rosa, M. L., et al. 2009, Astrophys. J., 696, 1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gary, G. A. 1989, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 69, 323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosain, S., Tiwari, S. K., & Venkatakrishnan, P. 2010, Astrophys. J., 720, 1281Google Scholar
Gosain, S., Venkatakrishnan, P., & Tiwari, S. K. 2009, Astrophys. J. Lett., 706, L240Google Scholar
Ichimoto, K., et al. 2008, Solar Phys., 249, 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosugi, T., et al. 2007, Solar Phys., 243, 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, B. C. 1982a, Solar Phys., 77, 43Google Scholar
Low, B. C. 1982b, Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, 20, 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, B. C. 1985, Measurements of Solar Vector Magnetic Fields, 2374, 49Google Scholar
Mackay, D. H. & van Ballegooijen, A. A. 2009, Solar Phys., 260, 321Google Scholar
McClymont, A. N. & Mikic, Z. 1994, Astrophys. J., 422, 899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, T. R., Jiao, L., McClymont, A. N., Canfield, R. C., & Uitenbroek, H. 1995, Astrophys. J., 439, 474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, Y., Choe, G. S., Yun, H. S., Park, Y. D., & Mickey, D. L. 2002, Astrophys. J., 568, 422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, Y. & Raadu, M. A. 1972, Solar Phys., 25, 127Google Scholar
Parker, E. N. 1979, Cosmical magnetic fields: Their origin and their activity (Oxford, Clarendon Press; New York, Oxford University Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Régnier, S. & Priest, E. R. 2007, Astron. Astrophys, 468, 701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakurai, T. 1979, Pub. Astron. Soc. Jap., 31, 209Google Scholar
Sakurai, T. 1989, Space Science Reviews, 51, 11Google Scholar
Schmidt, H. U. 1964, NASA Special Publication, 50, 107Google Scholar
Schrijver, C. J., et al. 2008, Astrophys. J., 675, 1637Google Scholar
Schrijver, C. J., et al. 2006, Solar Phys., 235, 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semel, M. 1967, Annales d'Astrophysique, 30, 513Google Scholar
Shimizu, T., et al. 2008, Solar Phys., 249, 221Google Scholar
Suematsu, Y., et al. 2008, Solar Phys., 249, 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiwari, S. K., Venkatakrishnan, P., & Gosain, S. 2010, Astrophys. J., 721, 622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiwari, S. K., Venkatakrishnan, P., Gosain, S., & Joshi, J. 2009a, Astrophys. J., 700, 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiwari, S. K., Venkatakrishnan, P., & Sankarasubramanian, K. 2009b, Astrophys. J. Lett., 702, L133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuneta, S., et al. 2008, Solar Phys., 249, 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Ballegooijen, A. A. & Cranmer, S. R. 2010, Astrophys. J., 711, 164Google Scholar
Venkatakrishnan, P. 1990, Solar Phys., 128, 371Google Scholar
Venkatakrishnan, P., Narayanan, R. S., & Prasad, N. D. N. 1993, Solar Phys., 144, 315Google Scholar
Venkatakrishnan, P. & Tiwari, S. K. 2009, Astrophys. J. Lett., 706, L114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatakrishnan, P. & Tiwari, S. K. 2010, Astron. Astrophys, 516, L5Google Scholar
Wiegelmann, T. 2004, Solar Phys., 219, 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegelmann, T., Lagg, A., Solanki, S. K., Inhester, B., & Woch, J. 2005, Astron. Astrophys, 433, 701Google Scholar