Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T19:57:23.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antarctica photometric survey using PDM13

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Cyrus Zalian  and
Merieme Chadid
Cyrus Zalian
Affiliation:
Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur
Merieme Chadid
Affiliation:
Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

PDM13 is a new graphic interface program dedicated to frequency domain analysis based on the Phase Dispersion Minimization technique (PDM, Stellingwerf 2012). In this paper, we will present the different algorithms running in PDM13, including the Auto-Segmentation, the Gauss-Newton and the PDM algorithms. More details on this triptych are available in our recent paper (Zalian et al., submitted). Their aim is to offer a simple and powerful way to extract frequency. Amongst the numerous improvements offered by the program, we will particularly focus on the reduction of aliases and the ability to look directly for multiple-period phenomena and the Blazhko effect. After that, we will show the first results from PDM13 using the Antarctica photometric survey.

Keywords

Frequency analysisphase dispersion minimizationgraphical interfaceAntarctica photometric survey
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Symposium S301: Precision Asteroseismology , August 2013 , pp. 511 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Björck, Å. 1996, Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems, (Philadelphia, SIAM 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadid, M., Vernin, J., Mekarnia, D., Chapellier, E., Trinquet, H., & Bono, G. 2010, A&A, 516, L15Google Scholar
Lee, A. F. S. & Heghinian, S. M. 1977, Technometrics, 19, 503Google Scholar
Lenz, P. & Breger, M. 2005, CoAst, 146, 53Google Scholar
Linnell Nemec, A. F. & Nemec, J. M. 1985, AJ, 90, 2317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A. 1997, ApJ, 489, 941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stellingwerf, R. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stobie, R. S. 1970, Observatory, 90, 20Google Scholar
Ulrych, T. J. & Bishop, T. N. 1975, Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, 13, 183CrossRefGoogle Scholar