Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:03:23.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analytical Binary Modeling and its Role in Dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2007

Tapan K. Chatterjee
Tapan K. Chatterjee*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of the Americas, Puebla, Mexico e-mail [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Binaries are critical tools that drive stellar systems; which play a major role in galactic dynamics. Internal evolution of globular clusters, e.g., due to evolution of binaries, can be modulated by external effects, like tidal shocks (e.g., Chernoff & Weinberg 1990). There are well-established relations between dynamical properties of globular clusters and their galactrocentric distance, R(g). A characteristic one is: D(1/2) ≈ [R(g)]1/2, where D(1/2) is the diameter containing half the mass / luminosity in projection (van den Bergh et al. 1991). This relation could be a result of tidal evaporation of clusters and feedback of forming protoclusters (Surdin, 1995). A similar limitation of globular cluster distributions is obtained in the half-mass density kinetic temperature plot and used in many cluster formation scenarios (Muray & Lin 1992). This relationship should have an explanation on the basis of dynamic evolution of the cluster population.

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 2 , Symposium S240: Binary Stars as Critical Tools & Tests in Contemporary Astrophysics , August 2006 , pp. 650 - 651
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Chatterjee, T.K. & Magalinsky, V.B. 2002, Astron. Astrophys. Trans. 21, 79 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, T.K. & Magalinsky, V.B. 2006, Astron. Astrophys. Tran. in pressGoogle Scholar
Chengalur, J.N., Salpeter, E.E., & Terzian, Y. 1996, ApJ, 461, 546 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernoff, D. & Weinberg, M. 1990, ApJ 351, 121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, J. & Hut, P. 1993, ApJS 85, 347 Google Scholar
Hut, P. et al. 1992, PASP 105, 981 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magalinsky, V.B. & Chatterjee, T.K. 2000, Astron. Astrophys. Trans. 18, 807 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muray, S.D. & Lin, D.N.C. 1992, ApJ 400, 265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surdin, V.G. 1995, Astron. Let. 21, N4 Google Scholar
Van den Bergh, S., Morbey, C., & Pazder, J. 1991, ApJ 375, 594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar