Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:12:20.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of stellar populations with large empirical libraries at high spectral resolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2006

Philippe Prugniel*
Affiliation:
Université Lyon 1, Observatoire de Lyon, St. Genis Laval, F-69230, France; CNRS UMR5574 Observatoire de Paris, GEPI, F-75014, France
Mina Koleva
Affiliation:
Université Lyon 1, Observatoire de Lyon, St. Genis Laval, F-69230, France; CNRS UMR5574 Department of Astronomy, St. Kl. Ohridski University of Sofia, BG-1164 Sofia, Bulgaria
Pierre Ocvirk
Affiliation:
CEA Saclay/Service d'Astrophysique, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, F-91191, France
Damien Le Borgne
Affiliation:
CEA Saclay/Service d'Astrophysique, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, F-91191, France
Caroline Soubiran
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Bordeaux, F-33270, Floirac, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The stellar population models dramatically progressed with the arrival of large and complete libraries, ELODIE, CFLIB (=Indo-US) and MILES at a relatively high resolution. We show that the quality of the fits is not anymore limited by the size of the stellar libraries in a large range of ages (0.1 to 10 Gyr) and metallicities (−2 to +0.4 dex). The main limitations of the empirical stellar libraries are (i) the coverage of the parameter space (lack of hot stars of low metallicity), (ii) the precision and homogeneity of the atmospheric parameters and (iii) the non-resolution of individual element abundances (in particular [α/Fe]). Detailed abundances measurements in the large libraries, and usage of theoretical libraries are probably the next steps, and we show that a combination between an empirical (ELODIE) and a theoretical library (Coelho et al. 2005) immediately improves the modeling of (α-enhanced) globular clusters.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Coelho, P., Barbuy, B., Meléndez, J., Schiavon, R. P., & Castilho, B. V., 2005, A&A 443, 735Google Scholar
Fioc, M., & Rocca-Volmerange, B., 1997, A&A 326, 950Google Scholar
Koleva, M., Bavouzet, N., Chilingarian, I., & Prugniel, Ph, 2006, astro-ph/0602362Google Scholar
Korn, A. J., Maraston, C., & Thomas, D., 2005, A&A 438, 685Google Scholar
LeBorgne, D Borgne, D et al. . 2004, A&A 425, 881Google Scholar
Ocvirk, P., Pichon, C., Lançon, A., & Thiébaut, E., 2006, MNRAS 365, 74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moultaka, J., Ilovaisky, S. A., Prugniel, P., & Soubiran, C., 2004, PASP 116, 693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prugniel, Ph. & Soubiran, C.,2001, A&A, 369, 1048Google Scholar
Prugniel, Ph. & Soubiran, C., 2004, astro.ph-/0409214Google Scholar
Sánchez-Blázquez, et al. 2006, MNRAS 371, 703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiavon, R., Caldwell, N., & Rose, J., 2004, AJ 127, 1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiavon, R., Rose, J., Courteau, S., & McArthur, L., 2005, ApJS 160, 163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdes, F., Gupta, R., Rose, J., Singh, H., & Bell, D., 2004, ApJS 152, 251CrossRefGoogle Scholar