Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:41:44.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AGN Evolution from Large and Deep X-Ray Surveys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2010

Marcella Brusa
Marcella Brusa*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute für Extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstrasse, 1 DE-85748, garching bei München, Germany Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over the last few years, the existence of mutual feedback effects between accreting supermassive black holes powering AGN and star formation in their host galaxies has become evident. This means that the formation and the evolution of AGN and galaxies should be considered as one and the same problem. As a consequence, the search for, and the characterization of the evolutionary and physical properties of AGN over a large redshift interval is a key topic of present research in the field of observational cosmology. Significant advances have been obtained in the last ten years thanks to the sizable number of XMM–Newton and Chandra surveys, complemented by multiwavelength follow-up programs. I will present some of the recent results and the ongoing efforts (mostly from the COSMOS and CDFS surveys) aimed at obtaining a complete census of accreting black holes in the universe, and a characterization of the properties of the host galaxies.

Keywords

galaxies: activegalaxies: starburstX-rays: galaxies
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S267: Co-Evolution of Central Black Holes and Galaxies , August 2009 , pp. 231 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Aird, J., et al. 2009, MNRAS, in press [arXiv:0910.1141]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, D. M., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, D. M., et al. 2005, ApJ, 632, 736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonucci, R. R. & Miller, J. S. 1985, ApJ, 297, 621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avni, Y. & Bahcall, J. N. 1980, ApJ 235, 694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, P. N., Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., Ivezic, Z., & White, S. D. M 2005, MNRAS, 362, 35Google Scholar
Brandt, W. N. & Hasinger, G. 2005, ARAA, 43, 827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusa, M., et al. 2005, A&A, 432, 69Google Scholar
Brusa, M., et al. 2009a, A&A, 507, 1277Google Scholar
Brusa, M., et al. 2009b, ApJ, 693, 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comastri, A., et al. 2002, ApJ, 571, 771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, L. L., Songaila, A., Hu, E. M., & Cohen, J. G. 1996, AJ, 112, 839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daddi, E., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donley, J. L., Rieke, G. H., Perez-Gonzalez, P. G., & Barro, G. 2008, ApJ, 687, 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrero, J., et al. 2009, A&A, 493, 55Google Scholar
Fiore, F., et al. 2008, ApJ, 692, 74Google Scholar
Gilli, R., Comastri, A., & Hasinger, G. 2007, A&A, 463, 79Google Scholar
Grazian, A., et al. 2006, A&A, 449, 951Google Scholar
Hasinger, G. 2008, A&A, 490, 905Google Scholar
Hickox, R. 2009, Chandra Newsletter, cover article [arXiv:0904.3543]Google Scholar
Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., Di Matteo, T., Robertson, B., & Springel, V. 2006, ApJS, 163, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, P. F., Hickox, R., Quataert, E., & Hernquist, L. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahnke, K., et al. 2009, ApJ, 706, 215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Franca, F., et al. 2005, ApJ, 635, 864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilly, S. J., et al. 2007, ApJS, 172, 70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magorrian, J., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 2285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiolino, R., et al. 2007, A&A, 468, 979Google Scholar
Marconi, A. & Hunt, L. K., 2003, ApJ, 589, L21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marconi, A., Risaliti, G., Gilli, R., Hunt, L. K., Maiolino, R., & Salvati, M. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menci, N., Fiore, F., Puccetti, S., & Cavaliere, A. 2008, ApJ, 686, 219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merloni, A. 2004, MNRAS, 353, 1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merloni, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, in press [arXiv:0910.4970]Google Scholar
Peng, C. Y., et al. 2006, ApJ, 649, 616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, B. M., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvato, M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, J. D., et al. 2008, ApJ, 679, 118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, J. D., et al. 2008, ApJ, 675, 1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treister, E. & Urry, C.M. 2006, ApJ 652, 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueda, Y., Akiyama, M., Ohta, K., & Miyaji, T. 2003, ApJ 598, 886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamada, T., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, J. H., Treu, T., Malkan, M. A., & Blandford, R. D. 2008, ApJ, 681, 925CrossRefGoogle Scholar