Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:35:07.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AGB stars in binaries and the common envelope interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2019

Orsola De Marco Open the ORCID record for Orsola De Marco [Opens in a new window]
Orsola De Marco*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia email: [email protected] Research Centre in Astronomy, Astrophysics and Astrophotonics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One may argue that, today, proceedings articles are not useful. Results belong in refereed papers and even reviews are best in publications that are long enough to do justice to the topic reviewed. In this short review, reflecting a presentation that was given at the IAU343 symposium, Why Galaxies Care about AGB Stars, I have therefore endeavoured to include some practical snippets that, while remaining true to the presentation, also provide a quick look up reference. After a reminder of how few AGB stars actually interact with a companion, and a pictorial summary of the types of interactions that can happen, I list the rapidly growing body of 3D common envelope simulations. Next, I highlight shortfalls and successes of simulations, and then spend some time comparing the two simulations of planetary nebulae from common envelope interactions to date. Finally, I summarise a handful of results pertaining to common envelope interactions between giants and planets.

Keywords

stars: AGB and post-AGBbinaries (including multiple): closeplanetary nebulae: generalmethods: numerical
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 14 , Symposium S343: Why Galaxies Care About AGB Stars: A Continuing Challenge through Cosmic Time , August 2018 , pp. 220 - 229
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2019 

References

Balbus, S. A. & Hawley, J. F. 1998, Reviews of Modern Physics, 70, 1 10.1103/RevModPhys.70.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlberg, J. K., Majewski, S. R., & Arras, P. 2009, ApJ, 700, 832 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamandy, L., Frank, A., Blackman, E. G., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 1898 10.1093/mnras/sty1950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Marco, O., Farihi, J., & Nordhaus, J. 2009, Journal of Physics Conference Series, 172, 012031 10.1088/1742-6596/172/1/012031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Marco, O. & Izzard, R. G. 2017, Pub. of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 34, e001 10.1017/pasa.2016.52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchêne, G. & Kraus, A. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 269 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, A., Chen, Z., Reichardt, T., et al. 2018, ArXiv e-prints arXiv:1807.05925Google Scholar
Fryer, C. L., Rockefeller, G., & Warren, M. S. 2006, ApJ, 643, 292 10.1086/501493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryxell, B., Olson, K., Ricker, P., et al. 2000, ApJ Supplement Series, 131, 273 Google Scholar
Galaviz, P., De Marco, O., Staff, J. E., & Iaconi, R. 2017, ApJ Supplement Series, 498, 293 Google Scholar
Garca-Segura, G., Ricker, P. M., & Taam, R. E. 2018, ApJ, 860, 19 10.3847/1538-4357/aac08cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichener, A., Sabach, E., & Soker, N. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 1818 10.1093/mnras/sty1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillwig, T. C., Frew, D. J., Reindl, N., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 24 10.3847/1538-3881/153/1/24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillwig, T. C., Jones, D., De Marco, O., et al. 2016, ApJ, 832, 125 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iaconi, R., De Marco, O., Passy, J.-C., & Staff, J. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 2349 10.1093/mnras/sty794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iaconi, R., Reichardt, T., Staff, J., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 4028 10.1093/mnras/stw2377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ireland, M. J., Scholz, M., & Wood, P. R. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 114 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19469.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, N. 2018, ApJ, 858, L24 10.3847/2041-8213/aac101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, N., Justham, S., Chen, X., et al. 2013, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 21, 59 10.1007/s00159-013-0059-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, N. & Nandez, J. L. A. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 362 10.1093/mnras/stw1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasliwal, M. M. 2012, PASA, 29, 482 10.1071/AS11061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuruwita, R. L., Staff, J., & De Marco, O. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 486 10.1093/mnras/stw1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, M., Ostriker, E. C., & Stone, J. M. 2018a, ArXiv e-prints arXiv:1808.05950Google Scholar
MacLeod, M., Ostriker, E. C., & Stone, J. M. 2018b, ApJ, 863, 5 10.3847/1538-4357/aacf08CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madappatt, N., De Marco, O., & Villaver, E. 2016, MNRAS, 470, 317 Google Scholar
Mauron, N. & Huggins, P. J. 2006, A&A, 452, 257 Google Scholar
Miszalski, B., Acker, A., Moffat, A. F. J., Parker, Q. A., & Udalski, A. 2009, A&A, 496, 813 Google Scholar
Nandez, J. L. A. & Ivanova, N. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 3992 10.1093/mnras/stw1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandez, J. L. A., Ivanova, N., & Lombardi, J. C. 2015, MNRAS, 450, L39 10.1093/mnrasl/slv043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandez, J. L. A., Ivanova, N., & Lombardi, Jr ., J. C. 2014, ApJ, 786, 39 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, J. & Blackman, E. G. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 2004 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10625.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlmann, S. T., Röpke, F. K., Pakmor, R., & Springel, V. 2016a, ApJ, 816, L9 10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/L9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlmann, S. T., Röpke, F. K., Pakmor, R., & Springel, V. 2017, A&A, 599, A5 Google Scholar
Ohlmann, S. T., Röpke, F. K., Pakmor, R., Springel, V., & Müller, E. 2016b, MNRAS, 462, L121 10.1093/mnrasl/slw144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Shea, B. W., Bryan, G., Bordner, J., et al. 2004, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints arXiv:astro-ph/0403044Google Scholar
Paczynski, B. 1976, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 73, Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems, ed. Eggleton, P., Mitton, S., & Whelan, J., 7510.1007/978-94-010-1483-0_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakmor, R. & Springel, V. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 176 10.1093/mnras/stt428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passy, J.-C. & Bryan, G. L. 2014, ApJ Supplement Series, 215, 8 Google Scholar
Passy, J.-C., Mac Low, M.-M., & De Marco, O. 2012, ApJ, 759, L30 10.1088/2041-8205/759/2/L30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pejcha, O., Metzger, B. D., & Tomida, K. 2016a, MNRAS, 461, 2527 10.1093/mnras/stw1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pejcha, O., Metzger, B. D., & Tomida, K. 2016b, MNRAS, 455, 4351 10.1093/mnras/stv2592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pian, E., D’Avanzo, P., Benetti, S., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 67 10.1038/nature24298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghavan, D., McAlister, H. A., Henry, T. J., et al. 2010, ApJ Supplement Series, 190, 1 Google Scholar
Rasio, F. A. & Livio, M. 1996, ApJ, 471, 366 10.1086/177975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regos, E. & Tout, C. A. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 146 10.1093/mnras/273.1.146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichardt, T. A., De Marco, O., Iaconi, R., Tout, C. A., & Price, D. J. 2018, ArXiv e-prints arXiv:1809.02297Google Scholar
Ricker, P. M. & Taam, R. E. 2008, ApJ, 672, L41 10.1086/526343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricker, P. M. & Taam, R. E. 2012, ApJ, 746, 74 10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., et al. 2012, Science, 337, 444 10.1126/science.1223344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandquist, E. L., Taam, R. E., & Burkert, A. 2000, ApJ, 533, 984 10.1086/308687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandquist, E. L., Taam, R. E., Chen, X., Bodenheimer, P., & Burkert, A. 1998, ApJ, 500, 909 10.1086/305778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiber, S. & Soker, N. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 2584 10.1093/mnras/sty843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soker, N. 1998, ApJ, 496, 833 10.1086/305407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staff, J. E., De Marco, O., Macdonald, D., et al. 2016a, MNRAS, 455, 3511 10.1093/mnras/stv2548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staff, J. E., De Marco, O., Macdonald, D., et al. 2016b, MNRAS, 455, 3511 10.1093/mnras/stv2548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staff, J. E., De Marco, O., Wood, P., Galaviz, P., & Passy, J.-C. 2016c, ArXiv e-prints arXiv:1602.03130Google Scholar
Stone, J. M., Gardiner, T. A., Teuben, P., Hawley, J. F., & Simon, J. B. 2008, ApJ Supplement Series, 178, 137 Google Scholar
Taam, R. E., Bodenheimer, P., & Ostriker, J. P. 1978, ApJ, 222, 269 10.1086/156142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terman, J. L. & Taam, R. E. 1996, ApJ, 458, 692 10.1086/176850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terman, J. L., Taam, R. E., & Hernquist, L. 1994, ApJ, 422, 729 10.1086/173765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terman, J. L., Taam, R. E., & Hernquist, L. 1995, ApJ, 445, 367 10.1086/175702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocknell, J., De Marco, O., & Wardle, M. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 2014 10.1093/mnras/stu079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toonen, S. & Nelemans, G. 2013, A&A, 557, A87 Google Scholar
Tricco, T. S. & Price, D. J. 2012, Journal of Computational Physics, 231, 7214 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.06.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villaver, E. & Livio, M. 2009, ApJ, 705, L81 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/L81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahn, J. P. 1966, Annales d’Astrophysique, 29, 313 Google Scholar