Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:02:35.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Advances in Telescope and Detector Technologies – Impacts on the Study and Understanding of Binary Star and Exoplanet Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2012

Edward F. Guinan
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085, USA email: [email protected]
Scott Engle
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085, USA email: [email protected]
Edward J. Devinney
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Current and planned telescope systems (both on the ground and in space) as well as new technologies will be discussed with emphasis on their impact on the studies of binary star and exoplanet systems. Although no telescopes or space missions are primarily designed to study binary stars (what a pity!), several are available (or will be shortly) to study exoplanet systems. Nonetheless those telescopes and instruments can also be powerful tools for studying binary and variable stars. For example, early microlensing missions (mid-1990s) such as EROS, MACHO and OGLE were initially designed for probing dark matter in the halos of galaxies but, serendipitously, these programs turned out to be a bonanza for the studies of eclipsing binaries and variable stars in the Magellanic Clouds and in the Galactic Bulge. A more recent example of this kind of serendipity is the Kepler Mission. Although Kepler was designed to discover exoplanet transits (and so far has been very successful, returning many planetary candidates), Kepler is turning out to be a “stealth” stellar astrophysics mission returning fundamentally important and new information on eclipsing binaries, variable stars and, in particular, providing a treasure trove of data of all types of pulsating stars suitable for detailed Asteroseismology studies. With this in mind, current and planned telescopes and networks, new instruments and techniques (including interferometers) are discussed that can play important roles in our understanding of both binary star and exoplanet systems. Recent advances in detectors (e.g. laser frequency comb spectrographs), telescope networks (both small and large – e.g. Super-WASP, HAT-net, RoboNet, Las Combres Observatory Global Telescope (LCOGT) Network), wide field (panoramic) telescope systems (e.g. Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) and Pan-Starrs), huge telescopes (e.g. the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT), the Overwhelming Large Telescope (OWL) and the Extremely Large Telescope (ELT)), and space missions, such as the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the possible NASA Explorer Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS – recently approved for further study) and Gaia (due for launch during 2013) will all be discussed. Also highlighted are advances in interferometers (both on the ground and from space) and imaging now possible at sub-millimeter wavelengths from the Extremely Long Array (ELVA) and Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA). High precision Doppler spectroscopy, for example with HARPS, HIRES and more recently the Carnegie Planet Finder Spectrograph, are currently returning RVs typically better than ~2-m/s for some brighter exoplanet systems. But soon it should be possible to measure Doppler shifts as small as ~10-cm/s – sufficiently sensitive for detecting Earth-size planets. Also briefly discussed is the impact these instruments will have on the study of eclipsing binaries, along with future possibilities of utilizing methods from the emerging field of Astroinformatics, including: the Virtual Observatory (VO) and the possibilities of analyzing these huge datasets using Neural Network (NN) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Bloemen, S., Marsh, T. R., Östensen, R. H., et al. , 2011, MNRAS, 410, 1787Google Scholar
Borne, K., Accomazzi, A., Bloom, J., et al. , 2009, astro2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, 2010, 6PGoogle Scholar
Borucki, W. J., et al. , 2011, arXiv:1112.1640Google Scholar
Burkart, J., Quataert, E., Arras, P., & Weinberg, N. N. 2011, arXiv:1108.3822Google Scholar
Groot, P. J. 2011, arXiv:1104.3428Google Scholar
Guinan, E. F. 1993, New Frontiers in Binary Star Research, 38, 1Google Scholar
Hallett, P. E. 1987, J. Optical Soc. America A, 4, 2330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, K. F., Czesla, S., Wolter, U., & Schmitt, J. H. M. M., 2010, A&A, 514, A39Google Scholar
Kipping, D. M. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloppenborg, B., Stencel, R., Monnier, J. D., et al. , 2010, Nature, 464, 870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, A. & Gaudi, B. S. 2003, ApJL, 588, L117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M. T., Udem, T., Holzwarth, R., et al. , 2007, MNRAS, 380, 839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterman, S., Diddams, S., Quinlan, F., et al. , 2011, BAAS, 43, #401.02Google Scholar
Santapaga, T., Guinan, E. F., Ballouz, R., Engle, S. G., & Dewarf, L. 2011, BAAS, 43, #343.12Google Scholar
Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A., Weiss, W., et al. , 2010, 38th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, 38, 2904Google Scholar
Seager, S. 2010, Exoplanet Atmospheres: Physical Processes. By Seager, Sara. Princeton University Press, 2010. ISBN: 978-1-4008-3530-0.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, T., Wilken, T., Araujo-Hauck, C., et al. , 2008, Science, 321, 1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilardell, F., Ribas, I., Jordi, C., Fitzpatrick, E. L., & Guinan, E. F. 2010, A&A, 509, A70Google Scholar
Welsh, W. F., Orosz, J. A., Aerts, C., et al. , 2011, ApJS, 197, 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucker, S., Mazeh, T., & Alexander, T. 2007, ApJ, 670, 1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar