Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:31:02.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

3D reconstruction of erupting filaments with STEREO data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2014

Ting Li  and
Jun Zhang
Ting Li
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Solar Activity, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; [email protected]; [email protected]
Jun Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Solar Activity, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; [email protected]; [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The launch of STEREO spacecraft in October 2006 provided an opportunity to view filament eruptions from two viewpoints giving new insights into their three-dimensional (3D) geometry and true trajectory. The kinematical parameters (velocity and acceleration vectors), the rotation motion, non-radial motion and the helical twist around the filament axis in 3D space have been obtained for the first time. All these properties of erupting filaments are very important to our understanding of the physical phenomena triggering the eruption and their early evolution. In the present paper we review different reconstruction techniques of erupting filaments and the main results obtained using the STEREO observations.

Keywords

filamentscoronal mass ejections (CMEs)flaresetc
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S300: Nature of Prominences and their role in Space Weather , June 2013 , pp. 215 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013 

References

Antiochos, S. K., DeVore, C. R., & Klimchuk, J. A. 1999, ApJ, 510, 485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bemporad, A. 2009, ApJ, 701, 298Google Scholar
Bemporad, A. 2011, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 73, 1117Google Scholar
Bemporad, A., Mierla, M., & Tripathi, D. 2011, A&A, 531, A147Google Scholar
Bi, Y., Jiang, Y., Yang, J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 773, 162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chifu, I., Inhester, B., Mierla, M., Chifu, V., & Wiegelmann, T. 2012, Sol. Phys., 281, 121Google Scholar
Fan, Y. 2005, ApJ, 630, 543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filippov, B. 2013, ApJ, 773, 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, H. R., Alexander, D., & Liu, R. 2007, Sol. Phys., 245, 287Google Scholar
Gissot, S. F., Hochedez, J.-F., Chainais, P., & Antoine, J.-P. 2008, Sol. Phys., 252, 397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosain, S. & Schmieder, B. 2010, Annales Geophysicae, 28, 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosain, S., Schmieder, B., Artzner, G., Bogachev, S., & Török, T. 2012, ApJ, 761, 25Google Scholar
Gosain, S., Schmieder, B., Venkatakrishnan, P., Chandra, R., & Artzner, G. 2009, Sol. Phys., 259, 13Google Scholar
Howard, R. A., Moses, J. D., Vourlidas, A., et al. 2008, Space Sci. Riv., 136, 67Google Scholar
Illing, R. M. E. & Hundhausen, A. J. 1986, JGR, 91, 1095Google Scholar
Inhester, B. 2006, arXiv:astro-ph/0612649Google Scholar
Jiang, Y., Yang, J., Hong, J., Bi, Y., & Zheng, R. 2011, ApJ, 738, 179Google Scholar
Joshi, A. D. & Srivastava, N. 2011, ApJ, 730, 104Google Scholar
Kahler, S. W., Moore, R. L., Kane, S. R., & Zirin, H. 1988, ApJ, 328, 824Google Scholar
Kaiser, M. L., Kucera, T. A., Davila, J. M., et al. 2008, Space Sci. Riv., 136, 5Google Scholar
Kliem, B. & Török, T. 2006, Physical Review Letters, 96, 255002Google Scholar
Li, T. & Zhang, J. 2013, ApJL, 770, L25Google Scholar
Li, T., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., & Yang, S. 2011, ApJ, 739, 43Google Scholar
Li, T., Zhang, J., Zhao, H., & Yang, S. 2010, ApJ, 720, 144Google Scholar
Liewer, P. C., de Jong, E. M., Hall, J. R., Howard, R. A., Thompson, W. T., Culhane, J. L., Bone, L., & van Driel-Gesztelyi, L. 2009, Sol. Phys., 256, 57Google Scholar
Liewer, P. C., Panasenco, O., & Hall, J. R. 2013, Sol. Phys., 282, 201Google Scholar
Liu, R., Kliem, B., Török, T., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 59Google Scholar
Moore, R. L., Sterling, A. C., Hudson, H. S., & Lemen, J. R. 2001, ApJ, 552, 833Google Scholar
Panasenco, O., Martin, S., Joshi, A. D., & Srivastava, N. 2011, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 73, 1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesnell, W. D., Thompson, B. J., & Chamberlin, P. C. 2012, Sol. Phys., 275, 3Google Scholar
Schrijver, C. J., Elmore, C., Kliem, B., et al. 2008, ApJ, 674, 586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y., Liu, Y., & Su, J. 2012, ApJ, 750, 12Google Scholar
Sterling, A. C., Harra, L. K., & Moore, R. L. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturrock, P. A. 1989, Sol. Phys., 121, 387Google Scholar
Tandberg-Hanssen, E., Martin, S. F., & Hansen, R. T. 1980, Sol. Phys., 65, 357Google Scholar
Thompson, W. T. 2006, A&A, 449, 791Google Scholar
Thompson, W. T. 2011, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 73, 1138Google Scholar
Thompson, W. T., Kliem, B., & Török, T. 2012, Sol. Phys., 276, 241Google Scholar
Török, T. & Kliem, B. 2005, ApJL, 630, L97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, C. & Alexander, D. 2013, Sol. Phys., 200Google Scholar