Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:24:30.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3D radiation MHD simulations of gas and dust in protoplanetary disks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2020

Mario Flock*
Affiliation:
Max-Planck Institut for Astronomy, Königstuhl 17, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany, email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

3D global radiation MHD simulations of gas and dust in protoplanetary disks allow us to understand the dynamical and thermal evolution of protoplanetary disks. At the same time, recent observations in the mm-dust emission by the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) allow us to resolve structures at scales of the disk scale height.

From our recent simulation results by Flock et al. (2015) and Flock et al. (2017) we are able to directly compare for the first time detailed observational constraints from high-resolution observations by ALMA with the gas and dust dynamics obtain in 3D state-of-art simulations of protoplanetary disks. Especially measurements of the dust scale height obtained from the disk around the young system HL Tau allow us to compare for different gas disk instability models. Further we use Monte Carlo radiation transfer models of the dusty disk to compare our results of the dust scale height in 3D radiation HD and MHD simulations. Our findings are that magnetized models fit perfectly the observational constraints, showing a strongly settled disk, while hydrodynamical turbulence leads to a dust uplifting which is larger than expected. These results open a new window to compare future multi-wavelength observations to simulations.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020 

References

Avenhaus, H., Quanz, S., Garufi, A., Perez, S., Casassus, S., Pinte, C., Bertrang, G., Caceres, C., Benisty, M., & Dominik, C. 2018, AJ, 863, 44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrang, G. H. -M., Avenhaus, H., Casassus, S., Montesinos, M., Kirchschlager, F., Perez, S., Cieza, L., & Wolf, S., 2018 MNRAS, 474, 5105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressing, Courtney D., & Charbonneau, David 2015, ApJ, 807, 45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flock, M., Ruge, J. P., Dzyurkevich, N., Henning, Th ., Klahr, H., & Wolf, S. 2015, A&A, 574, 68 Google Scholar
Flock, M., Nelson, R. P., Turner, N. J., Bertrang, G. H. -M., Carrasco-González, C., Henning, Th ., Lyra, W., & Teague, R., 2017 ApJ, 850, 131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruge, J. P., Flock, M., Wolf, S., Dzyurkevich, N., Fromang, S., Henning, Th ., Klahr, H., & Meheut, H., 2016 A&A, 590, 17 Google Scholar
Partnership, ALMA et al. 2015, ApJ 8083 (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ…808L…3A)Google Scholar
Pinte, C., Dent, W. R. F., Ménard, F., Hales, A., Hill, T., Cortes, P., & de Gregorio-Monsalvo, I. 2016, ApJ, 816, 25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidenschilling, S. J., 1977 MNRAS, 180, 57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar