Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:14:44.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

21cm Cosmology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2015

Mario G. Santos ,
David Alonso ,
Philip Bull ,
Stefano Camera  and
Pedro G. Ferreira
Mario G. Santos
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa SKA SA, 3rd Floor, The Park, Park Road, Pinelands, 7405, South Africa email: [email protected] CENTRA, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
David Alonso
Affiliation:
Astrophysics, University of Oxford, DWB, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK
Philip Bull
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1029 Blindern, N-0315 Oslo, Norway
Stefano Camera
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa CENTRA, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
Pedro G. Ferreira
Affiliation:
Astrophysics, University of Oxford, DWB, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A new generation of radio telescopes with unprecedented capabilities for astronomy and fundamental physics will be in operation over the next few years. With high sensitivities and large fields of view, they are ideal for cosmological applications. We discuss their uses for cosmology focusing on the observational technique of HI intensity mapping, in particular at low redshifts (z < 4). This novel observational window promises to bring new insights for cosmology, in particular on ultra-large scales and at a redshift range that can go beyond the dark energy domination epoch. In terms of standard constraints on the dark energy equation of state, telescopes such as Phase I of the SKA should be able to obtain constrains about as well as a future galaxy redshift surveys. Statistical techniques to deal with foregrounds and calibration issues, as well as possible systematics are also discussed.

Keywords

instrumentation: interferometersmethods: data analysiscosmology: observations(cosmology:) diffuse radiation(cosmology:) large-scale structure of universeradio lines: galaxies
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 10 , Symposium S306: Statistical Challenges in 21st Century Cosmology , May 2014 , pp. 165 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Abdalla, F. B., Blake, C., & Rawlings, S. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, D., Ferreira, P. G., & Santos, M. G. 2014Google Scholar
Ansari, R., Campagne, J. E., Colom, P., et al. 2012, A. & A., 540, A129Google Scholar
Bagla, J., Khandai, N., & Datta, K. K. 2010, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 407, 567Google Scholar
Battye, R. A., Browne, I. W. A., Dickinson, C., et al. 2013, M.N.R.A.S., 434, 1239Google Scholar
Battye, R. A., Davies, R. D., & Weller, J. 2004, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 355, 1339Google Scholar
Bernardi, G., de Bruyn, A. G., Brentjens, M. A., et al. 2009, A&A, 500, 965Google Scholar
Bernardi, G., de Bruyn, A. G., Harker, G., et al. 2010, A&A, 522, A67Google Scholar
Blake, C., Brough, S., Colless, M., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, P., Ferreira, P. G., Patel, P., & Santos, M. G. 2014, arXiv:1405.1452 [astro-ph.CO]Google Scholar
Camera, S., Santos, M. G., Ferreira, P. G., & Ferramacho, L. 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 171302Google Scholar
Chang, T.-C., Pen, U.-L., Bandura, K., & Peterson, J. B. 2010, Nature, 466, 463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, T.-C., Pen, U.-L., Peterson, J. B., & McDonald, P. 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 091303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, E., Abdalla, F. B., Harker, G., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 2518Google Scholar
CHIME Collaboration. 2012, Overview, http://chime.phas.ubc.ca/CHIME_overview.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dawson, K. S., Schlegel, D. J., Ahn, C. P., et al. 2013, AJ, 145, 10Google Scholar
DiMatteo, T. Matteo, T., Perna, R., Abel, T., & Rees, M. J. 2002, ApJ, 564, 576Google Scholar
Gleser, L., Nusser, A., & Benson, A. J. 2008, M.N.R.A.S., 391, 383Google Scholar
Hinshaw, G., Larson, D., Komatsu, E., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 19Google Scholar
Jelić, V., Zaroubi, S., Labropoulos, P., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 409, 1647Google Scholar
Jelić, V.et al. 2008, M.N.R.A.S., 389, 1319Google Scholar
Kaiser, N. 1987, Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc., 227, 1Google Scholar
Kerp, J., Winkel, B., Ben Bekhti, N., Flöer, L., & Kalberla, P. M. W. 2011, Astronomische Nachrichten, 332, 637Google Scholar
Lidz, A., Furlanetto, S. R., Oh, S. P., et al. 2011, ApJ, 741, 70Google Scholar
Liu, A. & Tegmark, M. 2011, Phys. Rev. D, 83, 103006Google Scholar
Liu, A., Tegmark, M., Bowman, J., et al. 2009, M.N.R.A.S., 398, 401Google Scholar
Loeb, A. & Wyithe, J. S. B. 2008, Physical Review Letters, 100, 161301Google Scholar
Mao, Y., Tegmark, M., McQuinn, M., Zaldarriaga, M., & Zahn, O. 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 78, 023529Google Scholar
Masui, K. W.et al. 2013, Ap. J. L., 763, L20Google Scholar
McDonald, P. & Seljak, U. 2009, JCAP, 0910, 007Google Scholar
McQuinn, M., Zahn, O., Zaldarriaga, M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 653, 815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. F., Aguirre, J. E., Parsons, A. R., Jacobs, D. C., & Pober, J. C. 2013, ApJ, 769, 154Google Scholar
Morales, M. F., Bowman, J. D., & Hewitt, J. N. 2006, ApJ, 648, 767Google Scholar
Obreschkow, D., Klöckner, H.-R., Heywood, I., Levrier, F., & Rawlings, S. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, S. P. & Mack, K. J. 2003, M.N.R.A.S., 346, 871Google Scholar
Peterson, J. B., Aleksan, R., Ansari, R., et al. 2009, arXiv:0902.3091 [astro-ph.IM]Google Scholar
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2013a, arXiv:1303.5062 [astro-ph.CO]Google Scholar
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2013b, arXiv:1303.5076 [astro-ph.CO]Google Scholar
Pritchard, J. R. & Loeb, A. 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 78, 103511Google Scholar
Santos, M. G., Cooray, A., & Knox, L. 2005, ApJ, 625, 575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seo, H.-J., Dodelson, S., Marriner, J., et al. 2010, Astrophys.J., 721, 164Google Scholar
Shaw, J. R., Sigurdson, K., Pen, U.-L., Stebbins, A., & Sitwell, M. 2013, ApJ, 781, 57Google Scholar
Shaw, J. R., Sigurdson, K., Sitwell, M., Stebbins, A., & Pen, U.-L. 2014, arXiv:1401.2095 [astro-ph.CO]Google Scholar
Switzer, E. R., Masui, K. W., Bandura, K., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 434, L46Google Scholar
Wang, X., Tegmark, M., Santos, M. G., & Knox, L. 2006, ApJ, 650, 529Google Scholar
White, M., Carlstrom, J. E., Dragovan, M., & Holzapfel, W. L. 1999, ApJ, 514, 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilman, R. J., Miller, L., Jarvis, M. J., et al. 2008, M.N.R.A.S., 388, 1335Google Scholar
Wolz, L., Abdalla, F. B., Blake, C., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 3271Google Scholar
Wyithe, J. S. B. & Loeb, A. 2008, M.N.R.A.S., 383, 606Google Scholar
Wyithe, J. S. B., Loeb, A., & Geil, P. M. 2008, M.N.R.A.S., 383, 1195Google Scholar