No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Topological criteria for schlichtness
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 April 2013
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
We give two sufficient criteria for schlichtness of envelopes of holomorphy in terms of topology. These are weakened converses of results of Kerner and Royden. Our first criterion generalizes a result of Hammond in dimension 2. Along the way, we also prove a generalization of Royden's theorem.
MSC classification
Secondary:
32D10: Envelopes of holomorphy
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 2013
References
1.Fornæss, J. E. and Zame, W. R., Riemann domains and envelopes of holomorphy, Duke Math. J. 50 (1983), 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Hammond, C., Schlicht envelopes of holomorphy and topology, Math. Z. 266 (2010), 285–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Jupiter, D., A schlichtness theorem for envelopes of holomorphy, Math. Z. 253 (2006), 623–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Kerner, H., Überlagerungen und Holomorphiehüllen, Math. Annalen 144 (1961), 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Rotman, J. J., An introduction to the theory of groups, 4th edn, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Volume 148 (Springer, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Royden, H. L., One-dimensional cohomology in domains of holomorphy, Annals Math. 78 (1963), 197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Stein, K., Überlagerungen holomorph-vollständiger komplexer Räume, Arch. Math. 7 (1956), 354–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access