Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:22:05.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subgroup Correspondences

Part of: Locally compact groups and their algebras Selfadjoint operator algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2018

S. Kaliszewski ,
Nadia S. Larsen  and
John Quigg
S. Kaliszewski
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA ([email protected]; [email protected])
Nadia S. Larsen
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, PO Box 1053 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway ([email protected])
John Quigg*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA ([email protected]; [email protected])
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For a closed subgroup of a locally compact group the Rieffel induction process gives rise to a C*-correspondence over the C*-algebra of the subgroup. We study the associated Cuntz–Pimsner algebra and show that, by varying the subgroup to be open, compact, or discrete, there are connections with the Exel–Pardo correspondence arising from a cocycle, and also with graph algebras.

Keywords

C*-correspondencesCuntz–Pimsner algebrasgroup C*-algebras

MSC classification

Primary: 46L08: $C^*$-modules
Secondary: 22D25: $C^*$-algebras and $W^*$-algebras in relation to group representations
Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , Volume 61 , Issue 4 , November 2018 , pp. 1127 - 1154
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dedicated to the memory of Ola Bratteli

References

1Albandik, S. and Meyer, R., Product systems over Ore monoids, Doc. Math. 20 (2015), 1331–1402.Google Scholar
2Bédos, E., Kaliszewski, S. and Quigg, J., On Exel–Pardo algebras, J. Operator Theory, 78(2) (2017), 309–345.Google Scholar
3Dixmier, J., C*-algebras (North-Holland, Publishing Company, New York, 1977).Google Scholar
4Exel, R. and Pardo, E., Self-similar graphs, a unified treatment of Katsura and Nekrashevych C*-algebras, Adv. Math. 306 (2017), 1046–1129.Google Scholar
5Fell, J. M. G., Weak containment and induced representations of groups. II, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 110 (1964), 424–447.Google Scholar
6Fowler, N. J. and Raeburn, I., The Toeplitz algebra of a Hilbert bimodule, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 48(1) (1999), 155–181.Google Scholar
7Green, P., The structure of imprimitivity algebras, J. Funct. Anal. 36(1) (1980), 88–104.Google Scholar
8Kajiwara, T., Pinzari, C. and Watatani, Y., Ideal structure and simplicity of the C*-algebras generated by Hilbert bimodules, J. Funct. Anal. 159(2) (1998), 295–322.Google Scholar
9Kaliszewski, S., Patani, N. and Quigg, J., Characterizing graph C*-correspondences, Houston J. Math. 38 (2012), 751–759.Google Scholar
10Katsura, T., On C*-algebras associated with C*-correspondences, J. Funct. Anal. 217(2) (2004), 366–401.Google Scholar
11Katsura, T., A construction of actions on Kirchberg algebras which induce given actions on their K-groups, J. Reine Angew. Math. 617 (2008), 27–65.Google Scholar
12Kirchberg, E. and Phillips, N. C., Embedding of exact C*-algebras in the Cuntz algebra ${\cal O}_2$, J. Reine Angew. Math. 525 (2000), 17–53.Google Scholar
13Kumjian, A., Pask, D. and Raeburn, I., Cuntz–Krieger algebras of directed graphs, Pacific J. Math. 184 (1998), 161–174.Google Scholar
14Laca, M. and Spielberg, J., Purely infinite C*-algebras from boundary actions of discrete groups, J. Reine Angew. Math. 480 (1996), 125–139.Google Scholar
15Laca, M., Raeburn, I., Ramagge, J. and Whittaker, M. F., Equilibrium states on the Cuntz–Pimsner algebras of self-similar actions, J. Funct. Anal. 266(11) (2014), 6619–6661.Google Scholar
16Mackey, G. W., Induced representations of locally compact groups. I, Ann. of Math. (2) 55 (1952), 101–139.Google Scholar
17Mann, M. H., Raeburn, I. and Sutherland, C. E., Representations of compact groups, Cuntz–Krieger algebras, and groupoid C*-algebras, in Miniconference on probability and analysis (Sydney, 1991), Proceedings of the Centre for Mathematics and its Applications Volume 29, pp. 135–144 (The Australian National University, Canberra, 1992).Google Scholar
18Mann, M. H., Raeburn, I. and Sutherland, C. E., Representations of finite groups and Cuntz–Krieger algebras, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 46(2) (1992), 225–243.Google Scholar
19Marcus, M. and Minc, H., A survey of matrix theory and matrix inequalities, Allyn and Bacon Series in Advanced Mathematics (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, 1964).Google Scholar
20Morgan, A., Cuntz–Pimsner algebras associated to tensor products of C*-correspondences, J. Aust. Math. Soc. 102(3) (2017), 348–368.Google Scholar
21Muhly, P. S. and Solel, B., On the Morita equivalence of tensor algebras, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 81(1) (2000), 113–168.Google Scholar
22Nekrashevych, V., C*-algebras and self-similar groups, J. Reine Angew. Math. 630 (2009), 59–123.Google Scholar
23Phillips, N. C., A classification theorem for nuclear purely infinite simple C*-algebras, Doc. Math. 5 (2000), 49–114 (electronic).Google Scholar
24Raeburn, I., Graph algebras, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, Volume 103 (Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC, 2005).Google Scholar
25Raeburn, I. and Williams, D. P., Morita equivalence and continuous-trace C*-algebras, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, Volume 60 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998).Google Scholar
26Rieffel, M. A., Induced representations of C*-algebras, Adv. Math. 13 (1974), 176–257.Google Scholar
27Spielberg, J., C*-algebras for categories of paths associated to the Baumslag–Solitar groups, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 86(3) (2012), 728–754.Google Scholar
28Williams, D. P., Crossed products of C*-algebras, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, Volume 134 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2007).Google Scholar
29Zimmer, R. J., Ergodic theory and semisimple groups, Monographs in Mathematics, Volume 81 (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1984).Google Scholar