Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:04:14.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semisimple radical classes of involution algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

N. V. Loi
N. V. Loi
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestV. Reáltanodau. 13-15H-1053, Hungary
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

J. Wichman has asked about semisimple radical classes of involution algebras. In the present paper we describe the semisimple radical classes of involution algebras over a field K* with involution *. If K* is infinite, then there are only trivial semisimple radical classes. If K* is finite then these classes are subdirect closures of strongly hereditary finite sets of finite idempotent algebras. In proving this result we determine the structure of certain simple involution algebras. We prove that the variety of symmetric involution algebras over Z(2) does not have attainable identities, answering a problem posed by Gardner [2]. Most of the results are valid also for involution rings (over the integers).

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , February 1989 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1989

References

REFERENCES

1.Gardner, B. J., Semisimple radical classes of algebras and attainability of identities, Pacific J. Math. 61 (1975), 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Gardner, B. J., Extension-closure and attainability of varieties of algebras with involution, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 21 (1980), 285–292.Google Scholar
3.Gardner, B. J., Radicals and varieties, Coll. Math. Soc. J. Bolyai 38. Radical Theory (Eger, 1982, North-Holland, 1985).Google Scholar
4.Herstein, I. N., Rings with Involution (Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, Chicago, 1976).Google Scholar
5.Kaplansky, I., Fields and rings (Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, Chicago, 1969).Google Scholar
6.Loi, N. V. and Wiegandt, R., Involution algebras and the Anderson–Divinsky–Sulinski property, Acta Sci. Math. Szeged, 50 (1986), 5–14.Google Scholar
7.Loi, N. V., On the radical theory of involution algebras, Acta Univ. Carolin. Ser. Matematica Physica 27 (1986), 29–40.Google Scholar
8.Loi, N. V., A note on the radical theory of involution algebras, Studia Sci. Math. Hangar., to appear.Google Scholar
9.Montgomery, S., A structure theorem and a positive definiteness condition in rings with involution, J. Algebra, 43 (1976), 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Salavova, K., Radicals of rings with involution, 1; 2, Comment. Math. Univ. Carotin., 18 (1977), 367–381; 455–467 (Russian).Google Scholar
11.Wiegandt, R., Radical and semisimple classes of rings (Queen's Papers in Pure and Applied Mathematics, No. 37, Kingston, 1974).Google Scholar