Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:28:17.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reducing the classical multipliers ℓ∞, C0 and bv0

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Stephen A. Saxon  and
William H. Ruckle
Stephen A. Saxon
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Florida, Po Box 118000, Gainesville, FL 32611–8000, USA E-mail address: [email protected]
William H. Ruckle
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634–1907, USA E-mail address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For R ∈ {bv0, c0, ℓ∞} a multiplier of FK spaces, the classical sectional convergence theorems permit the reduction of R to any of its dense barrelled subspaces as a simple consequence of the Closed Graph Theorem. (Cf. the Bachelis/Rosenthal reduction of R = ℓ∞ to its dense barrelled subspace m0.) A natural modern setting permits the reduction of R to any of the larger class of dense βφ subspaces. Bennett and Kalton's FK setting remarkably reduced R = ℓ∞ to any of its dense subspaces. This extreme reduction also obtains in the modern βφ setting since, surprisingly, every dense subspace of ℓ∞ is a βφ subspace. Moreover, the standard results, including the Bennett/Kalton reduction, easily follow from their βφ versions and the Closed Graph Theorem. Our two supporting papers find relevant “Non-barrelled dense βφ subspaces” and study “Generalized sectional convergence and multipliers”. Here we specialize the βφ approach to ordinary, particularly unconditional, sectional convergence.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 345 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1997

References

REFERENCES

1. Bachelis, G. F. and Rosenthal, H. P., On unconditionally converging series and biorthogonal systems in Banach spaces, Pacific J. Math. 37 (1971), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bennett, G. and Kalton, N. J., Addendum to FK spaces containing c 0, Duke Math. J. 39 (1972), 819–821.Google Scholar
3. Garling, D. J. H., On topological sequence spaces, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 63 (1967), 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Horváth, J., Topological Vector Spaces and Distributions, Vol. I. (Reading, Addison-Wesley, 1966).Google Scholar
5. Kadec, M. I. and Pelczynski, A., Basic sequences, biorthogonal sequences and norming sets in Banach and Fréchet spaces, Studia Math. 25 (1965), 297–323 (Russian).Google Scholar
6. Ruckle, W., Lattices of sequence spaces, Duke Math. J. 35 (1968), 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Ruckle, W. H. and Saxon, S. A., Generalized sectional convergence and multipliers, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 193 (1995), 680–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Saxon, S. A., Non-barrelled dense βφ subspaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 196 (1995), 428–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Saxon, S. and Wilansky, A., The equivalence of some Banach space problems, Colloq. Math. 37 (1977), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Wilansky, A., Modern Methods in Topological Vector Spaces, (New York, McGraw-Hill, 1978).Google Scholar