Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:02:28.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the methods of extending Dirac's equation of the electron to general relativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

D Martin
Affiliation:
The Royal Technical College, Glasgow.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Introduction. The problem of extending Dirac's equation of the electron to general relativity has been attacked by many authors, by methods which fall roughly into either of two classes according as the formulation does or does not require the introduction of a local Galilean system of coordinates at each point of space-time. As examples of the former class we mention the methods of Fock (1929) and of Cartan (1938), and as representing the latter class the method described by Ruse (1937). Also, Whittaker (1937) discovered a vector whose vanishing is completely equivalent to the Dirac equations, but this method, unlike the others in the second category, does not apply the Riemannian technique to spinors but only to vectors and tensors derived from these. Now Cartan has denied the possibility of fitting a spinor into Riemannian Geometry if his point of view of spinors is adhered to, and this he argues accounts for the “choquant” properties with which they have been endowed by the geometricians in order to enable them to write down an expression of the usual form for the covariant derivative of a spinor. Consequently, doubt has been cast on the compatibility of the various methods, so in this paper an attempt is made to clarify the matter by working out explicitly the case of the general metric by some of the more important of these methods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1942

References

REFERENCES

Cartan, : Leçons sur la Théorie des Spineurs, t. 2 (1938).Google Scholar
Eisenhart, : Riemannian Geometry (1926).Google Scholar
Fock, : Zeitschrift für Physih, 57 (1929), 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, : Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh, 57 (1937), 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrödinger, : Sitzungsberichte der Akad. Berlin (1932), 105.Google Scholar
Veblen, , Taub, and von Neumann, : Proc. N. A. S., 20 (1934), 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyl, : Theory of Grovps and (Quantum Mechanics (1931).Google Scholar
Whittaker, : Proc. Royal Soc., A, 158 (1937), 38.Google Scholar