Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:44:35.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On quotients of tensor algebras and their C*-envelopes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Paul S. Muhly  and
Baruch Solel
Paul S. Muhly
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA ([email protected])
Baruch Solel
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The Technion, 32000 Haifa, Israel ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We identify the C*-envelopes of certain quotients of tensor algebras over C*-correspondences.

Keywords

tensor algebrasC*-envelopes
Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 361 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 2000

References

1. Arveson, W., Subalgebras of C*-algebras, Acta Math. 123 (1969), 141–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Blecher, D., Muhly, P. and Paulsen, V., Categories of operator modules (Morita equivalence and projective modules), Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 143, no. 681 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Davidson, K., Nest algebras, Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, vol. 191 (Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, 1988).Google Scholar
4. Davis, C., Kahan, W. and Weinberger, W., Norm preserving dilations and their applications to optimal error bounds, SIAM J. Numer. Analysis 19 (1982), 445–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Gabriel, P. and Roiter, A., Representations of finite-dimensional algebras, in Algebra VIII, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences (Springer, 1992).Google Scholar
6. Hochschild, G., On the structure of algebras with nonzero radical, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 53 (1947), 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Lance, E. C., Hilbert C*-modules—a toolkit for operator algebraists, London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes (Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Muhly, P. S., A finite dimensional introduction to operator algebra, in Operator algebras and applications (ed. Katavolos, A.), pp. 313–354, NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. C, Math. Phys. Sci., vol. 495 (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997).Google Scholar
9. Muhly, P. and Solel, B., Tensor algebras over C*-correspondences (representations, dilations, and C*-envelopes), J. Funct. Analysis 158 (1998), 389–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Muhly, P. and Solel, B., On the Morita equivalence of tensor algebras, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (In the press.)Google Scholar
11. Pimsner, M., A class of C*-algebras generalizing both Cuntz–Krieger algebras and crossed products by ℤ, in Free probability theory (ed. Voiculescu, D.), Fields Institute Communications, vol. 12, pp. 189–212 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997).Google Scholar
12. Popescu, G., Isometric dilations for infinite sequences of noncommuting operators, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 316 (1989), 523–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Popescu, G., Noncommuting disc algebras and their representations, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 124 (1996), 2137–2148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Rieffel, M., Induced representations of C*-algebras, Adv. Math. 13 (1974), 176–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Solel, B., Operator algebras over C*-correspondences, in Operator algebras and applications (ed. Katavolos, A.), pp. 429–448, NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. C, Math. Phys. Sci., vol. 495 (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997).Google Scholar