Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:35:38.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Muckenhoupt Class Weight Decomposition and BMO Distance to Bounded Functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2019

Morten Nielsen
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University, Skjernvej 4A, DK-9220 Aalborg East, Denmark ([email protected])
Hrvoje Šikić
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Bijenička 30, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia ([email protected])

Abstract

We study the connection between the Muckenhoupt Ap weights and bounded mean oscillation (BMO) for general bases for ℝd. New classes of bases are introduced that allow for several deep results on the Muckenhoupt weights–BMO connection to hold in a very general form. The John–Nirenberg type inequality and its consequences are valid for the new class of Calderón–Zygmund bases which includes cubes in ℝd, but also the basis of rectangles in ℝd. Of particular interest to us is the Garnett–Jones theorem on the BMO distance, which is valid for cubes. We prove that the theorem is equivalent to the newly introduced A2-decomposition property of bases. Several sufficient conditions for the theorem to hold are analysed as well. However, the question whether the theorem fully holds for rectangles remains open.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Chang, S.-Y. A. and Fefferman, R., Some recent developments in Fourier analysis and H p-theory on product domains, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 12(1) (1985), 143.Google Scholar
2Coifman, R. R. and Rochberg, R., Another characterization of BMO, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 79(2) (1980), 249254.Google Scholar
3Cruz–Uribe, D. V., Martell, J. M. and Pérez, C., Weights, extrapolation and the theory of Rubio de Francia, Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, Volume 215 (Birkhäuser/Springer Basel, Basel, 2011).Google Scholar
4Duoandikoetxea, J., Martín Reyes, F. J. and Ombrosi, S., On the A conditions for general bases, Math. Z. 282(3–4) (2016), 955972.Google Scholar
5García–Cuerva, J. and Rubio de Francia, J. L., Weighted norm inequalities and related topics, North-Holland Mathematics Studies, Volume 116 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985).Google Scholar
6Garnett, J. B. and Jones, P. W., The distance in BMO to L , Ann. of Math. (2) 108(2) (1978), 373393.Google Scholar
7Grafakos, L., Modern Fourier analysis, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 3rd edn, Volume 250 (Springer, New York, 2014).Google Scholar
8Heil, C. and Powell, A. M., Gabor Schauder bases and the Balian-Low theorem, J. Math. Phys. 47(11) (2006), 113506, 21.Google Scholar
9Hytönen, T. and Pérez, C., Sharp weighted bounds involving A , Anal. PDE 6(4) (2013), 777818.Google Scholar
10Jawerth, B., Weighted inequalities for maximal operators: linearization, localization and factorization, Amer. J. Math. 108(2) (1986), 361414.Google Scholar
11Jones, P. W., Factorization of A p weights, Ann. of Math. (2) 111(3) (1980), 511530.Google Scholar
12Korenovskyy, A. A., Lerner, A. K. and Stokolos, A. M., On a multidimensional form of F. Riesz's ‘rising sun’ lemma, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 133(5) (2005), 14371440.Google Scholar
13Nielsen, M. and Šikić, H., Schauder bases of integer translates, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 23(2) (2007), 259262.Google Scholar
14Nielsen, M. and Šikić, H., Quasi-greedy systems of integer translates, J. Approx. Theory 155(1) (2008), 4351.Google Scholar
15Nielsen, M. and Šikić, H., On stability of Schauder bases of integer translates, J. Funct. Anal. 266(4) (2014), 22812293.Google Scholar
16Pérez, C., Weighted norm inequalities for general maximal operators, Publ. Mat. 35(1) (1991), 169186.Google Scholar
17Rubio de Francia, J. L., Factorization theory and A p weights, Amer. J. Math. 106(3) (1984), 533547.Google Scholar
18Soria, F., A remark on A 1-weights for the strong maximal function, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 100(1) (1987), 4648.Google Scholar