Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T01:30:21.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Local regularity for nonlinear elliptic and parabolic equations with anisotropic weights

Part of: Partial differential equations Parabolic equations and systems Elliptic equations and systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2023

Changxing Miao  and
Zhiwen Zhao
Changxing Miao
Affiliation:
Beijing Computational Science Research Center, Beijing 100193, China Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, P.O. Box 8009, Beijing 100088, China ([email protected])
Zhiwen Zhao
Affiliation:
Beijing Computational Science Research Center, Beijing 100193, China ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to capture the asymptotic behaviour for solutions to a class of nonlinear elliptic and parabolic equations with the anisotropic weights consisting of two power-type weights of different dimensions near the degenerate or singular point, especially covering the weighted p-Laplace equations and weighted fast diffusion equations. As a consequence, we also establish the local Hölder estimates for their solutions in the presence of single power-type weights.

Keywords

local regularityanisotropic weightsweighted Poincaré inequalityweighted p-Laplace equationsweighted fast diffusion equations

MSC classification

Primary: 35B65: Smoothness and regularity of solutions 35J92: Quasilinear elliptic equations with $p$-Laplacian 35K57: Reaction-diffusion equations
Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , May 2023 , pp. 391 - 436
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on Behalf of The Edinburgh Mathematical Society.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akagi, G., Rates of convergence to non-degenerate asymptotic profiles for fast diffusion via energy methods, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 247(no. 2) (2023), .10.1007/s00205-023-01843-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badiale, M. and Tarantello, G., A Sobolev-Hardy inequality with applications to a nonlinear elliptic equation arising in astrophysics, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 163(4) (2002), 259–293.10.1007/s002050200201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahouri, H., Chemin, J. -Y. and Gallagher, I., Refined Hardy inequalities, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 5(3) (2006), 375–391.Google Scholar
Berryman, J. B. and Holland, C. J., Stability of the separable solution for fast diffusion, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 74 (1980), 379–388.10.1007/BF00249681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonforte, M. and Figalli, A., Sharp extinction rates for fast diffusion equations on generic bounded domains, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 74(4) (2021), 744–789.10.1002/cpa.21887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonforte, M., Grillo, G. and Vázquez, J. L., Behaviour near extinction for the fast diffusion equation on bounded domains, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 97(1) (2012), 1–38.10.1016/j.matpur.2011.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonforte, M. and Vázquez, J. L., Positivity, local smoothing, and Harnack inequalities for very fast diffusion equations, Adv. Math. 223(2) (2010), 529–578.10.1016/j.aim.2009.08.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabré, X. and Ros-Oton, X., Sobolev and isoperimetric inequalities with monomial weights, J. Differential Equations 255(11) (2013), 4312–4336.10.1016/j.jde.2013.08.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabré, X., Ros-Oton, X. and Serra, J., Sharp isoperimetric inequalities via the ABP method, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 18(12) (2016), 2971–2998.10.4171/JEMS/659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caffarelli, L., Kohn, R. and Nirenberg, L., First order interpolation inequalities with weights, Compos. Math. 53 (1984), 259–275.Google Scholar
Chanillo, S. and Wheeden, R. L., Weighted Poincaré and Sobolev inequalities and estimates for weighted Peano maximal functions, Amer. J. Math. 107(5) (1985), 1191–1226.10.2307/2374351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y. Z. and DiBenedetto, E., On the local behavior of solutions of singular parabolic equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 103(4) (1988), 319–345.Google Scholar
Chiarenza, F. and Serapioni, R. P., A Harnack inequality for degenerate parabolic equations, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 9(8) (1984), 719–749.10.1080/03605308408820346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chua, S. -K. and Wheeden, R. L., Estimates of best constants for weighted Poincaré inequalities on convex domains, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 93(1) (2006), 197–226.10.1017/S0024611506015826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daskalopoulos, P. and Kenig, C., Degenerate diffusions. Initial value problems and local regularity theory, EMS Tracts in Mathematics, Volume 1 (European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich, 2007).10.4171/033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Giorgi, E., Sulla differenziabilità e l’analiticità delle estremali degli integrali multipli regolari, Mem. Accad. Sci. Torino. Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat. (3) 3 (1957), 25–43.Google Scholar
DiBenedetto, E., Gianazza, U. and Vespri, V., Harnack’s inequality for degenerate and singular parabolic equations, Springer Monographs in Mathematics (Springer, New York, 2012).10.1007/978-1-4614-1584-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiBenedetto, E. and Kwong, Y. C., Harnack estimates and extinction profile for weak solution of certain singular parabolic equations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 330(2) (1992), 783–811.10.1090/S0002-9947-1992-1076615-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiBenedetto, E., Kwong, Y. C. and Vespri, V., Local space-analyticity of solutions of certain singular parabolic equations, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 40(2) (1991), 741–765.10.1512/iumj.1991.40.40033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, H. J., Li, Y. Y. and Yang, Z. L., Optimal gradient estimates of solutions to the insulated conductivity problem in dimension greater than two, arXiv:2110.11313.Google Scholar
Dong, H. J., Li, Y. Y. and Yang, Z. L., Gradient estimates for the insulated conductivity problem: the non-umbilical case, arXiv:2203.10081.Google Scholar
Fabes, E. B., Kenig, C. E. and Serapioni, R. P., The local regularity of solutions of degenerate elliptic equations, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 7(1) (1982), 77–116.10.1080/03605308208820218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feireisl, E. and Simondon, F., Convergence for semilinear degenerate parabolic equations in several space dimension, J. Dynam. Differential Equations 12 (2000), 647–673.10.1023/A:1026467729263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafakos, L., Classical Fourier analysis, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 3rd edn, Volume 249 (Springer, New York, 2014).10.1007/978-1-4939-1194-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, C. E. and Wheeden, R. L., Harnack’s inequality for degenerate parabolic equations, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 16(4–5) (1991), 745–770.10.1080/03605309108820776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinonen, J., Kilpeläinen, T. and Martio, O., Nonlinear potential theory of degenerate elliptic equations, Unabridged Republication of the 1993 Original (Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY, 2006).Google Scholar
Jin, T. L., and Xiong, J. G., Optimal boundary regularity for fast diffusion equations in bounded domains, Amer. J. Math. 145(no. 1) (2023), 151–219.10.1353/ajm.2023.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, T. L. and Xiong, J. G., Regularity of solutions to the Dirichlet problem for fast diffusion equations, arXiv:2201.10091.Google Scholar
Kwong, Y. C., Interior and boundary regularity of solutions to a plasma type equation, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 104(2) (1988), 472–478.10.1090/S0002-9939-1988-0962815-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. Y., and Yan, X. K., Anisotropic Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg type inequalities, Adv. Math. 419 (2023), .10.1016/j.aim.2023.108958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C. S., Interpolation inequalities with weights, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 11(14) (1986), 1515–1538.Google Scholar
Lindqvist, P., Notes on the stationary p-Laplace equation, SpringerBriefs in Mathematics, (Springer, Cham, 2019).10.1007/978-3-030-14501-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, H. and Squassina, M., Fractional Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg inequalities, J. Funct. Anal. 274(9) (2018), 2661–2672.10.1016/j.jfa.2017.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, H. and Squassina, M., On Hardy and Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg inequalities, J. Anal. Math. 139(2) (2019), 773–797.10.1007/s11854-025-0077-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, P. E., Continuity of solutions of a singular parabolic equation, Nonlinear Anal. 7(4) (1983), 387–409.10.1016/0362-546X(83)90092-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrin, J., Local behavior of solutions of quasi-linear equations, Acta Math. 111 (1964), 247–302.10.1007/BF02391014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surnachev, M., A Harnack inequality for weighted degenerate parabolic equations, J. Differential Equations 248(8) (2010), 2092–2129.10.1016/j.jde.2009.08.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudinger, N. S., On Harnack type inequalities and their application to quasilinear elliptic equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 20 (1967), 721–747.10.1002/cpa.3160200406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez, J. L., The porous medium equation: mathematical theory, Oxford Mathematical Monographs (The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007).Google Scholar