Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:31:55.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic Algebras Associated with Polyploidy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

P. Holgate
P. Holgate
Affiliation:
Biometrics Section, The Nature Conservancy, 19 Belgrave Square, London, S.W.1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The relationship between certain non-associative algebras and the deterministic theory of population genetics was first investigated by Etherington (3)-(8), who defined the concepts of baric, train and special train algebras. Gonshor (10) dealt with, among other topics, algebras corresponding to autopolyploidy, on the assumption that chromosome segregation operated. In this paper [ discuss algebras corresponding to more general systems of inheritance among polyploids, which have been discussed without using algebras by Haldane (11), Geiringer (9), Moran (13) and Seyffert (16). These algebras are special cases of what I have defined as segregation algebras, and mixtures of them. All the algebras corresponding to a fixed ploidy have a relationship which I have called special isotopy. An example shows that algebras arise in other genetic systems which are not isotopic to segregation algebras.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , June 1966 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1966

References

REFERENCES

(1)Albert, A. A.Non-associative algebras. I. Fundamental concepts and isotopy, Ann. Math., 43 (1943), 685–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Bruck, R. H.Some results in the theory of linear non-associative algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 56 (1944), 141–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Etherington, I. M. H.On non-associative combinations, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 59 (1939), 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Etherington, I. M. H.Genetic algebras, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 59 (1939), 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Etherington, I.M. H.Commutative train algebras of ranks 2 and 3,J. London Math. Soc, 15 (1940), 136–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Etherington, I. M. H.Special train algebras, Quart. J. Math. 12 (1941), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Etherington, I. M. H.Duplication of linear algebras, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. (2), 6 (1941), 222–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Etherington, I. M. H.Non-associative algebra and the symbolism of genetics, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh B, 61 (1941), 24–42.Google Scholar
(9)Geiringer, H.Chromatid segregation of tetraploids and hexaploids,Genetics, 34(1949), 665–684.Google Scholar
(10)Gonshor, H., Special train algebras arising in genetics, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. (2), 12 (1960), 41–53.Google Scholar
(11)Haldane, J. B. S. Theoretical genetics of autopolyploids, (1930) J. Genetics 22 (1930), 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Jacobson, N.A note on non-associative algebras, Duke Math. J., 3 (1937), 544–548.Google Scholar
(13)Moran, P. A. P.Statistical Processes of Evolutionary Theory (Oxford, 1962).Google Scholar
(14)Reiersøl, O.Genetic algebras studied recursively and by means of differential operators. Math. Scand., 10 (1962), 25–44.Google Scholar
(15)Schafer, R. D.Structure of genetic algebras, Amer. J. Math., 71 (1949), 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)Seyfferty, W.Theoretische Untersuchungen iiber die Zusammensetzung tetrasomer Populationen. I. Panmixie, Biom. Zeit., 2 (1960), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar