No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2009
Fourier's Theorem, as usually stated, is
Most writers give this without limitation, but De Morgan (Diff. and Int. Calc. pp. 618 &c.) directs attention to what he calls the apparent neglect by previous writers of the limitation of the theorem to functions which satisfy the condition
* G(regory ?). On Fourier&s Theorem. Cambridge Mathematical Journal, HI., pp. 288–290.
Walton, W. A demonstration of Fourier&s Theorem. Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, VIII., pp. 136–138.Google Scholar
Glaither, J. W. L. On Fourier&s double-integral Theorem. Messenger of Mathematics, II., pp. 20–24. Google Scholar
Du Bois Beymond, P. Sur les formules de représentation dee fonctioiis Comptes rendus… Paris, XCH., pp. 915–918, 962–964.Google Scholar
These are in addition to the list given by Freeman at the place above cited.