Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:31:31.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commutative algebras in Drinfeld categories of abelian Lie algebras

Part of: Categories with structure Lie algebras and Lie superalgebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2012

Alexei Davydov  and
Vyacheslav Futorny
Alexei Davydov
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik, Vivatsgasse 7, 53111 Bonn, Germany
Vyacheslav Futorny
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of São Paulo, CEP 05315-970, São Paulo, Brazil ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We describe (braided-) commutative algebras with non-degenerate multiplicative form in certain braided monoidal categories, corresponding to abelian metric Lie algebras (so-called Drinfeld categories). We also describe local modules over these algebras and classify commutative algebras with a finite number of simple local modules.

Keywords

monoidal categoryDrinfeld categorymetric Lie algebralocal module

MSC classification

Secondary: 18D10: Monoidal categories (= multiplicative categories), symmetric monoidal categories, braided categories 17B10: Representations, algebraic theory (weights)
Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , October 2012 , pp. 613 - 633
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 2012

References

1.Cartan, H. and Eilenberg, S., Homological algebra (Princeton University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
2.Drinfeld, V., On quasitriangular quasi-Hopf algebras and on a group that is closely connected with Gal(ℚ/ℚ), Alg. Analiz 2(4) (1990), 149–181 (in Russian).Google Scholar
3.Fröhlich, J., Fuchs, J., Runkel, I. and Schweigert, C., Correspondences of ribbon categories. Adv. Math. 199 (2006), 192–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Joyal, A. and Street, R., Braided tensor categories, Adv. Math. 102 (1993), 20–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Kazhdan, D. and Lusztig, G., Tensor structures arising from affine Lie algebras, I, J. Am. Math. Soc. 6 (1993), 905–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kazhdan, D. and Lusztig, G., Tensor structures arising from affine Lie algebras, III, J. Am. Math. Soc. 7 (1994), 335–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Kirillov, A. Jr. and Ostrik, V., On a q-analogue of the McKay correspondence and the ADE classification of conformal field theories, Adv. Math. 171 (2002), 183–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Lepowsky, J. and Li, H., Introduction to vertex operator algebras and their representations, Progress in Mathematics, Volume 227 (Birkhäuser, 2004).Google Scholar
9.Medina, A. and Revoy, Ph., Algèbres de Lie et produit scalaire invariant, Annales Scient. Éc. Norm. Sup. 18 (1985), 553–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Pareigis, B., On braiding and dyslexia, J. Alg. 171 (1995), 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar