Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:57:09.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Co-H-Spaces and Almost Localization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2014

Cristina Costoya
Affiliation:
Departamento de Computatión, Álxebra, Universidade da Coruña, Campus Elviña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain, ([email protected])
Norio Iwase
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mathematics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 810-8560, Japan, ([email protected])

Abstract

Apart from simply connected spaces, a non-simply connected co-H-space is a typical example of a space X with a coaction of 1 (X) along rX: X1 (X), the classifying map of the universal covering. If such a space X is actually a co-H-space, then the fibrewise p-localization of rX (or the ‘almost’ p-localization of X) is a fibrewise co-H-space (or an ‘almost’ co-H-space, respectively) for every prime p. In this paper, we show that the converse statement is true, i.e. for a non-simply connected space X with a coaction of 1 (X) along rX, X is a co-H-space if, for every prime p, the almost p-localization of X is an almost co-H-space.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bendersky, M., A functor which localizes the higher homotopy groups of an arbitrary CW-complex, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Volume 418, pp. 1321 (Springer, 1975).Google Scholar
2.Bousfield, A. K. and Kan, D. M., Homotopy limits, completions and localizations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Volume 304 (Springer, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Costoya, C., Co-H-spaces and localization, Israel J. Math. 180 (2010), 6992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Dold, A., Partitions of unity in the theory of fibrations, Annals Math. 78 (1963), 223255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Eilenberg, S. and Ganea, T., On the Lusternik–Schnirelmann category of abstract groups, Annals Math. 65 (1957), 517518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Fox, R. H., On the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category, Annals Math. 42(2) (1941), 333370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Henn, W., On almost rational co-H-spaces, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 87 (1983), 164168.Google Scholar
8.Hilton, P., Mislin, G. and Roitberg, J., On co-H-spaces, Comment. Math. Helv. 53 (1978), 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Hubbuck, J. R. and Iwase, N., A p-complete version of the Ganea conjecture on co-H-spaces, in Lusternik-Schnirelmann category and related topics, South Hadley, MA, 2001, Contemporary Mathematics, Volume 316, pp. 127133 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Iwase, N., Co-H-spaces and the Ganea conjecture, Topology 40 (2001), 223234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Iwase, N., Saito, S. and Sumi, T., Homology of the universal covering space of a co-H-space, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 351 (1999), 48374846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.James, I. M., Fibrewise topology (Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.James, I. M., Introduction to fibrewise homotopy theory, Handbook of Algebraic Topology, pp. 169194 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1995).Google Scholar
14.May, J. P., Fiberwise localization and completion, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 258 (1980), 127146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Oda, N., Pairings and copairings in the category of topological spaces, RIMS Kyoto Univ. 28 (1992), 8397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Zabrodsky, A., Hopf spaces, North-Holland Mathematics Studies, Volume 22 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar