Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T10:27:50.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Bernstein-Gabber-Joseph theorem for affine algebras*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

V. V. Bavula  and
T. H. Lenagan
V. V. Bavula
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Kiev University, Vladimirskaya Str, 64 Kiev 252617Ukraine E-mail address: [email protected]
T. H. Lenagan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh, James Clerk Maxwell Building King's Buildings Mayfield Road, EdinburghEH9 3JZ E-mail address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Bernstein's famous result, that any non-zero module M over the n-th Weyl algebra An satisfies GKdim(M)≥GKdim(An)/2, does not carry over to arbitrary simple affine algebras, as is shown by an example of McConnell. Bavula introduced the notion of filter dimension of simple algebra to explain this failure. Here, we introduce the faithful dimension of a module, a variant of the filter dimension, to investigate this phenomenon further and to study a revised definition of holonomic modules. We compute the faithful dimension for certain modules over a variant of the McConnell example to illustrate the utility of this new dimension.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 311 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1999

References

REFERENCES

1.Bavula, V., Filter dimension of algebras and modules, a simplicity criterion of generalized Weyl algebras, Comm. Algebra 24 (1996), 1971–1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bavula, V., Krull, Gelfand-Kirillov and filter dimensions of simple affine algebras, J. Algebra 206 (1998), 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bavula, V., Krull and Gelfand-Kirillov dimensions of simple almost commutative algebras.Google Scholar
4.Bernstein, I. N., The analytic continuation of generalized functions with respect to a parameter, Funct. Anal. Appl. 6 (1972), 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Krause, G. R. and Lenagan, T. H., Growth of algebras and Gelfand-Kirillov dimension (Pitman, 1985).Google Scholar
6.Joseph, A., Applications de la Thèorie des anneaux algèbres enveloppantes, Cours de troisième cycle. Univ. de Paris VI, mimeographed notes, 1981.Google Scholar
7.McConnell, J. C., Representations of solvable Lie algebras V: On the Gelfand-Kirillov dimension of simple modules, J. Algebra 76 (1982), 489–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.McConnell, J. C. and Robson, J. C., Noncommutative noetherian rings (Wiley, 1987).Google Scholar
9.McConnell, J. C. and Robson, J. C., Gelfand-Kirillov dimension, Hilbert-Samuel polynomials and rings of differential operators, Perspectives in ring theory (Antwerp, 1987), 233–238, NATO Adv. Sei. Inst. Ser. C: Math. Phys. Sci., 233, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1988.Google Scholar
10.Smith, S. P., Krull dimension of the enveloping algebra of sl(2,ℂ), J. Algebra 71 (1981), 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Stafford, J. T., Non-holonomic modules over Weyl algebras and enveloping algebras, Invent. Math. 79 (1985), 619–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar