Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:38:29.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Banach Space which is not Equivalent to an Adjoint Space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

J. D. Weston
Affiliation:
University of DurhamKing's College, Newcastle upon Tyne
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A Banach space which is not reflexive may or may not be equivalent (in Banach's sense) to an adjoint space. For example, it is an elementary fact that the space (l), though not reflexive, is equivalent to (co)*, where (co) is the space of all sequences that converge to zero, normea in the usual way. On the other hand, (co) itself is not equivalent to any adjoint space : this can be proved by means of the Krein-Milman theorem, but here we obtain the result by an elementary argument which is scarcely more complicated than the standard proof that (co) is not reflexive.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1958