We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Conversely, Catanese (2017) inquires about what conditions need to be satisfied by a group of that sort in order to be the fundamental group of a Kodaira fibration. In this short note we collect some restrictions on the image of the classifying map $m \colon \Pi_b \to \Gamma_g$ in terms of the coinvariant homology of $\Pi_g$. In particular, we observe that if π is the fundamental group of a Kodaira fibration with relative irregularity g−s, then $g \leq 1+ 6s$, and we show that this effectively constrains the possible choices for π, namely that there are group extensions as above that fail to satisfy this bound, hence it cannot be the fundamental group of a Kodaira fibration. A noteworthy consequence of this construction is that it provides examples of symplectic 4-manifolds that fail to admit a Kähler structure for reasons that eschew the usual obstructions.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
1
1Arapura, D., Toward the structure of fibered fundamental groups of projective varieties, J. Éc. polytech. Math.4 (2017), 595–611.Google Scholar
2
2Barja, M. Á., González–Alonso, V. and Naranjo, J. C., Xiao's conjecture for general fibred surfaces, J. Reine Angew. Math.739 (2018), 297–308.Google Scholar
3
3Barth, W., Hulek, K., Peters, C. and Van de Ven, A., Compact complex surfaces, 2nd edn, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics, Volume 4 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004).Google Scholar
4
4Baykur, R. İ., Non-holomorphic surface bundles and Lefschetz fibrations, Math. Res. Lett.19 (2012), 567–574.Google Scholar
5
5Baykur, R. İ. and Margalit, D., Indecomposable surface bundles over surfaces, J. Topol. Anal.5 (2013), 161–181.Google Scholar
6
6Beauville, A., L'inégalité$p_g \geq 2q-4$pour les surfaces de type général, Appendix to O. Debarre, Inégalités numériques pour les surfaces de type général, Bull. Soc. Math. France110(3) (1982), 319–346.Google Scholar
7
7Catanese, F., Kodaira fibrations and beyond: methods for moduli theory, Jpn. J. Math.12(2) (2017), 91–174.Google Scholar
8
8Endo, H., Korkmaz, M., Kotschick, D., Ozbagci, B. and Stipsicz, A., Commutators, Lefschetz fibrations and the signatures of surface bundles, Topology41 (2002), 961–977.Google Scholar
9
9Flapan, L., Monodromy of Kodaira fibrations of genus 3, preprint (arXiv:1709.03164, 2017).Google Scholar
10
10Hillman, J., Complex surfaces which are fibre bundle, Topology Appl.100 (2000), 187–191.Google Scholar
11
11Hillman, J., Sections of surface bundles, in Interactions between low-dimensional topology and mapping class groups (ed. Inanc Baykur, R., Etnyre, John and Hamenstädt, Ursula), pp. 1–20, Geometry and Topology Monographs, Volume 19 (Mathematical Sciences, 2015).Google Scholar
12
12Johnson, F. E. A., A class of non-Kählerian manifolds, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.100(3) (1986), 519–521.Google Scholar
13
13Kotschick, D., On regularly fibered complex surfaces, in Proceedings of the Kirbyfest (Berkeley, CA, 1998) (ed. Hass, Joel and Scharlemann, Martin), pp. 291–298, Geometry and Topology Monographs, Volume 2 (Mathematical Sciences, 1999).Google Scholar
15Rolfsen, D., Knots and links, corrected reprint of the 1976 original, Mathematics Lecture Series, Volume 7 (Publish or Perish, Houston, TX, 1990), xiv+439 pp.Google Scholar
16
16Thurston, W., Some simple examples of symplectic manifolds, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.55(2) (1976), 467–468.Google Scholar
17
17Wall, C. T. C. (ed.) List of problems, in Homological group theory (Proc. Sympos., Durham, 1977), London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series,Volume 36 (Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar