Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:56:23.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VIRTUALLY HOSTED HACKATHONS FOR DESIGN RESEARCH: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING ANNUAL (IDEA) CHALLENGE 2022

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Daniel Nygaard Ege ,
Mark Goudswaard ,
Ole Nesheim ,
Sindre W Eikevåg ,
Øystein Bjelland ,
Kim A Christensen ,
Robert Ballantyne ,
Shuo Su ,
Chris Cox  and
Louis Timperley
...Show all authors
Daniel Nygaard Ege*
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology;
Mark Goudswaard
Affiliation:
University of Bristol;
Ole Nesheim
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology;
Sindre W Eikevåg
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology;
Øystein Bjelland
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology;
Kim A Christensen
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology;
Robert Ballantyne
Affiliation:
University of Bristol;
Shuo Su
Affiliation:
University of Bristol;
Chris Cox
Affiliation:
University of Bristol;
Louis Timperley
Affiliation:
University of Bristol;
Omsri Aeddula
Affiliation:
Blekinge Institute of Technology;
Raj Jiten Machchhar
Affiliation:
Blekinge Institute of Technology;
Ryan Ruvald
Affiliation:
Blekinge Institute of Technology;
Jie Li
Affiliation:
Aalto University;
Sara Figueiredo
Affiliation:
Aalto University;
Saurabh Deo
Affiliation:
Aalto University;
Nikola Horvat
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb
Ivan Čeh
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb
Jelena Šklebar
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb
Daniel Miler
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb
James Gopsill
Affiliation:
University of Bristol;
Ben Hicks
Affiliation:
University of Bristol;
Martin Steinert
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology;
*
Ege, Daniel Nygaard, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The International Design Engineering Annual (IDEA) Challenge is a virtually hosted hackathon for Engineering Design researchers with aims of: i) generating open access datasets; ii) fostering community between researchers; and, iii) applying great design minds to develop solutions to real design problems. This paper presents the 2022 IDEA challenge and elements of the captured dataset with the aim of providing insights into prototyping behaviours at virtually hosted hackathons, comparing it with the 2021 challenge dataset and providing reflections and learnings from two years of running the challenge. The dataset is shown to provide valuable insights into how designers spend their time at hackathon events and how, why and when prototypes are used during their design processes. The dataset also corroborates the findings from the 2021 dataset, demonstrating the complementarity of physical and sketch prototypes. With this paper, we also invite the wider community to contribute to the IDEA Challenge in future years, either as participants or in using the platform to run their own design studies.

Keywords

PrototypingHackathonDesign methodsDesign practiceDesign engineering
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 3811 - 3820
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Briscoe, G., Mulligan, C., 2014. Digital Innovation: The Hackathon Phenomenon. Creativeworks London 6,1–13.Google Scholar
Camburn, B., Viswanathan, V., Linsey, J., Anderson, D., Jensen, D., Crawford, R., Otto, K., Wood, K., 2017. Design prototyping methods: state of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines. Des. Sci. 3, e13. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ege, Daniel Nygaard, Goudswaard, Mark, Gopsill, James, Steinert, Martin, Hicks, Ben, 2023. What, how and when should i prototype? an empirical study of design team prototyping strategies at the idea challenge hackathon. Under review.Google Scholar
Erichsen, J.F., Sjöman, H., Steinert, M., Welo, T., 2021. Protobooth: gathering and analyzing data on prototyping in early-stage engineering design projects by digitally capturing physical prototypes. AIEDAM 35, 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060420000414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K.A., 2017. Protocol Analysis, in: Bechtel, W., Graham, G. (Eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, pp. 425–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405164535.ch33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flus, M., Hurst, A., 2021. Design at hackathons: new opportunities for design research. Des. Sci. 7, e4. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2021.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giunta, L., Gopsill, J., Kent, L., Goudswaard, M., Snider, C., Hicks, B., 2022. Pro2Booth: Towards an Improved Tool for Capturing Prototypes and the Prototyping Process. Proc. Des. Soc. 2, 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudswaard, M., Kent, L., Giunta, L., Gopsill, J., Snider, C., Valjak, F., Christensen, K.A., Felton, H., Ege, D.N., Real, R.M., Cox, C., Horvat, N., Kohtala, S., Eikevåg, S.W., Martinec, T., Perišić, M.M., Steinert, M., Hicks, B., 2022. Virtually Hosted Hackathons for Design Research: Lessons Learned from the International Design Engineering Annual (IDEA) Challenge 2021. Proc. Des. Soc. 2, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, L., Gopsill, J., Giunta, L., Goudswaard, M., Snider, C., Hicks, B., 2022. Prototyping through the Lens of Network Analysis and Visualisation. Proc. Des. Soc. 2, 743–752. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAlpine, H., Hicks, B.J., Huet, G., Culley, S.J., 2006. An investigation into the use and content of the engineer's logbook. Design Studies 27, 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J., Berlin, A., Menold, J., 2019. ARCHIE: An Automated Data Collection Method for Physical Prototyping Efforts in Authentic Design Situations, in: Volume 7: 31st International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. Presented at the ASME 2019 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Anaheim, California, USA, p. V007T06A044. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2019-97444Google Scholar
Pe-Than, E.P.P., Herbsleb, J.D., 2019. Understanding Hackathons for Science: Collaboration, Affordances, and Outcomes, in: Taylor, N.G., Christian-Lamb, C., Martin, M.H., Nardi, B. (Eds.), Information in Contemporary Society, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, M.B., Ulrich, K.T., Flowers, W.C., 1992. Evaluating prototyping technologies for product design. Research in Engineering Design 3, 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580518CrossRefGoogle Scholar