No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
VALUE ANALYSIS TO IMPROVE SYSTEM ARCHITECTING
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2021
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Value Analysis (VA) is a collaborative method that could be used to make a decision in the early phase of complex projects. In this framework, Stakeholders are involved into the process of decisionmaking and project success is facilitated. Systeme Architechting (SA) is a set of processes used for the conceptual phase of the design of complex systems while System Engineering (SE) is the set of processes used for the design phase of the system. In complex projects, Stakeholders are multiple and carry specific technical, social and environmental expectations that define their perceived Value of the project. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that VA and SA are two complementary approaches to collect and analyse Stakeholder needs in a complex project. The article presents an analysis of the literature review on VA and SA / SE. Based on this analysis, an illustration case is proposed to show how to integrate VA into SA to understand the needs of Stakeholders. The article concludes that the two methods VA and SA can be combined to analyze and would allow following several dimensions of Value (economic, social and environmental) within a complex project.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Batista, J., Hassan, A. and Bonjour, E. (2020) ‘Design Thinking to enhance Requierements Analysis in Systems Engineering’, in International Design Conference, pp. 2255–2264.Google Scholar
Baxter, G. and Sommerville, I. (2011) ‘Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering’, Interacting with Computers. Elsevier B.V., 23(1), pp. 4–17. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, P. et al. (2010) ‘Value management practice by South African quantity surveyors’, Facilities, 28(1), pp. 46–63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632771011011396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comission, European (1995) Value Management - handbook, Facilities Management: Theory and Practice. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203475966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, M. T. (2012) ‘A Holistic and Cultural view of Value’, Advances in Management & Applied Economics, 2(1), pp. 55–107.Google Scholar
Fernandes, M. T. (2015) ‘Value Analysis: Going into a further dimension’, Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 5(2), pp. 781–789. Available at: www.etasr.com.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Graaf, R. et al. (2019) ‘Value Engineering as a Specialty for Systems Engineering: Exploring Opportunities’, Insight, 22(1), pp. 41–44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/inst.12237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hass, K. B. and Lindbergh, L. B. (2010) ‘The bottom line on project complexity: Applying a New Complexity Model’, in PMI® Global Congress 2010—North America, Washington, DC. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, pp. 1–16. Available at: https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/project-complexity-model-competency-standard-6586.Google Scholar
INCOSE and IEEE Computer Society (2016) Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK), Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK). Available at: http://g2sebok.incose.org/app/mss/menu/index.cfm.Google Scholar
ISO/IEC/IEEE 42020:2019:2019-07 (2019) ‘Software, systems and enter pr ise — Architecture processes’, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Kolltveit, B. J. and Grønhaug, K. (2004) ‘The importance of the early phase: The case of construction and building projects’, International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), pp. 545–551. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalevée, A. et al. (2020) ‘The interest of an evolution of Value Management methodology in Complex Technical Projects for improving Project Management’, Procedia CIRP, ‘Life Cycle Engineering’ 2020 conference, 90, pp. 411–415. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.108.Google Scholar
Lyneis, J. M., Cooper, K. G. and Els, S. A. (2001) ‘Strategic management of complex projects: A case study using system dynamics’, System Dynamics Review, 17(3), pp. 237–260. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sdr.213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, M. W. and Rechtin, E. (2000) The Art of Systems Architecting - Second edition. https://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420058529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malviya, S. et al. (2017) ‘What Questions do Requirements Engineers Ask?’, Proceedings - 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2017, (September), pp. 100–109. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/RE.2017.76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NF EN 1325:2014-04 (2014) ‘Value Management — Vocabulary — Terms and definitions’, Association française de normalisation, La Plaine Saint-Denis, France.Google Scholar
NF X50-152:2007-09 (2007) ‘Value management — Basic characteristics of value analysis’, Association française de normalisation, La Plaine Saint-Denis, France.Google Scholar
Yang, L. et al. (2019) ‘Integrated design of transport infrastructure and public spaces considering human behavior: A review of state-of-the-art methods and tools’, Frontiers of Architectural Research. Elsevier, 8(4), pp. 429–453. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.FOAR.2019.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access