Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:02:10.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uncertainty Analysis of a Calculation Model for Electric Bearing Impedance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

P. Welzbacher ,
S. Puchtler ,
A. Geipl  and
E. Kirchner
P. Welzbacher*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
S. Puchtler
Affiliation:
Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
A. Geipl
Affiliation:
Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
E. Kirchner
Affiliation:
Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The integration of Sensing Machine Elements (SME) is a promising approach to obtain reliable data about relevant process and state variables of technical systems. However, the quality and reliability of the provided data strongly depends on the corresponding calculation model of the SME and the therein included uncertainty. Consequently, in this contribution, the calculation model of a sensory utilized rolling bearing, as exemplary SME, is systematically analyzed using existing methods and tools to identify uncertainty that critically affects the quality and reliability of the data provided.

Keywords

uncertaintysystematic approachdesign methodologysensing machine elementssensory utilised rolling bearing
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 653 - 662
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Bureau international des poids et mesures (2012), International vocabulary of metrology - basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM): JCGM 200:2012, 3rd edition, 2008 version with minor corrections, JCGM, Sèvres.Google Scholar
Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V. (2015), Quality management systems: Fundamentals and vocabulary (DIN EN ISO 9000), November 2015, Beuth, Berlin.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, R., Birkhofer, H., Kloberdanz, H. and Mathias, J. (2009), “Uncertainty-Mode- and Effects-Analysis – an Approach to Analyze and Estimate Uncertainty in the Product Life Cycle”, DS 58-2: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 2, Design Theory and Research Methodology, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 24.-27.08.2009, pp. 191–202.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, R., Koenen, J.F., Enss, G.C., Sichau, A., Platz, R., Kloberdanz, H., Birkhofer, H. and Hanselka, H. (2010), “A Model to Categorise Uncertainty in Load-Carrying Systems”, 1st MMEP International Conference on Modelling and Management Engineering Processes, pp. 53–64.Google Scholar
Grebici, K., Goh, Y.M. and McMahon, C. (2008), “Uncertainty and Risk Reduction in Engineering Design Embodiment Processes”, DS 48: Proceedings DESIGN 2008, the 10th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 143–156.Google Scholar
Hausmann, M., Koch, Y. and Kirchner, E. (2021), “Managing the uncertainty in data-acquisition by in situ measurements: a review and evaluation of sensing machine element-approaches in the context of digital twins”, International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 48–65.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (2009), Risk management: Vocabulary (ISO Guide 73), November 2009, Beuth, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kreye, M.E., Goh, Y. and Newnes, L.B. (2011), “Manifestation of uncertainty. A classification”, in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 11, Design Society, København, pp. 96–107.Google Scholar
Martin, G., Vogel, S., Schirra, T., Vorwerk-Handing, G. and Kirchner, E. (2018), “Methodical Evaluation of Sensor Positions for Condition Monitoring of Gears”, in Design in the era of digitalization: NordDesign 2018 Linköping University, August 14-17, 2018, The Design Society, Scotland.Google Scholar
Mathias, J. (2016), “Auf dem Weg zu robusten Lösungen”, Doctoral Thesis, Darmstadt, 2016.Google Scholar
Matt, D.T. and Rauch, E. (2020), “SME 4.0: The Role of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Digital Transformation”, in Zsifkovits, H., Modrák, V. and Matt, D.T. (Eds.), Industry 4.0 for SMEs: Challenges, Opportunities and Requirements, Springer; OAPEN Foundation, pp. 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murch, L.E. and Wilson, W.R.D. (1975), “A Thermal Elastohydrodynamic Inlet Zone Analysis”, Journal of Lubrication Technology, Vol. 97 No. 2, p. 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberkampf, W.L., DeLand, S.M., Rutherford, B.M., Diegert, K.V. and Alvin, K.F. (2002), “Error and uncertainty in modeling and simulation”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 75 No. 3, pp. 333–357.Google Scholar
Prashad, H. (1988), “Theoretical evaluation of Impedance, Capacitance and Charge Accumulation on Roller Bearings Operated under Electrical Fields”, Wear, No. 125, 223-239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schirra, T., Martin, G., Puchtler, S. and Kirchner, E. (2021), “Electric impedance of rolling bearings - Consideration of unloaded rolling elements”, Tribology International, Vol. 158, p. 106927.Google Scholar
Schirra, T., Martin, G., Vogel, S. and Kirchner, E. (2018), “Ball Bearings as Sensors for Systematical Combination of Load and Failure Monitoring”, paper presented at DESIGN 2018 - 15th International Design Conference.Google Scholar
Vorwerk-Handing, G. (2021), “Erfassung systemspezifischer Zustandsgrößen. Physikalische Effektkataloge zur systematischen Identifikation potentieller Messgrößen”, Doctoral Thesis, Darmstadt, 2021.Google Scholar
Vorwerk-Handing, G., Gwosch, T., Schork, S., Kirchner, E. and Matthiesen, S. (2020a), “Classification and examples of next generation machine elements”, Forschung im Ingenieurwesen, Vol. 84 No. 1, pp. 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorwerk-Handing, G., Welzbacher, P. and Kirchner, E. (2020b), “Consideration of uncertainty within the conceptual integration of measurement functions into existing systems”, Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 52, pp. 301–306.Google Scholar
Walker, W.E., Harremoës, P., Rotmans, J., van der Sluijs, J.P., van Asselt, M.B.A., Janssen, P. and Krayer von Krauss, M.P. (2003), “Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support”, Integrated Assessment, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weck, O. de, Eckert, C.M. and Clarkson, P.J. (2007), “A Classification of Uncertainty for Early Product and System Design”, DS 42: Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, Paris, France, 28.-31.07.2007, 159-160 (exec. Summ.), full paper no. DS42_P_480.Google Scholar
Welzbacher, P., Vorwerk-Handing, G. and Kirchner, E. (2021), “A Control List for the Systematic Identification of Disturbance Factors”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 1, pp. 51–60.Google Scholar