Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-16T21:49:19.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TOWARD A FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE EXPERIENCE DESIGN EDUCATION AND AN ILLUSTRATIVE CASE OF A SERVICE DESIGN THINKING COURSE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Yong Se Kim  and
Rida Kamal
Yong Se Kim*
Affiliation:
University of Turku
Rida Kamal
Affiliation:
University of Turku
*
Kim, Yong Se, University of Turku, Finland, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In sustainable experience design education, experience activities of consumers and users, design activities of student designers, and education activities of instructors should be addressed. It would be meaningful to compare various sustainable experience design education efforts considering regional and cultural context. This paper describes a framework where experience, design and education activities are systematically represented with diverse contexts also represented in a structured manner. Student design projects in a service design thinking course are illustrated where sustainability is gently introduced.

Keywords

SustainabilityDesign educationDesign processExperience design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 3551 - 3560
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Bhamra, T., Lilley, D., and Tang, T. (2011), “Design for Sustainable Behaviour: Using Products to Change Consumer Behaviour”, The Design Journal, 14, 427–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boks, C., and Diehl, J. C. (2006), “Integration of sustainability in regular courses: experiences in industrial design engineering”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 14, Issues 9–11, Pages 932–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceschin, F. and Gaziulusoy, I. (2016), “Evolution of Design for Sustainability: from Product Design to Design for System Innovations and Transitions”, Design Studies, 47, 118 – 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorst, K., and Cross, N. (2001), “Creativity in the Design Process: Co-Evolution of Problem–Solution”, Design Studies. 22 (5): 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D.School, (2018), Design Thinking Bootleg, https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/design-thinking-bootleg.Google Scholar
Goedkoop, M.J., van Halen, C.J,G., te Riele, H.R.M. and Rommens, P.J.M. (1999), Product Service Systems, Ecological and Economic Basics, the Dutch ministries of Environment (VROM) and Economic Affairs (EZ).Google Scholar
Kim, M.S., Kim, Y.S., and Kim, T.H. (2007), “Analysis of Team Interaction and Team Creativity of Student Design Teams Based on Personal Creativity Modes”, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, September 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.S., and Hong, Y.K. (2019), “A Systematic Method to Design Product-Service Systems Using Personalization Services based on Experience Evaluations”, International Journal of Product Development, 23 (4), pp.353–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.S. and Lee, S.W. (2011), “Service Design for Product-Service Systems using Context-Based Activity Modeling”, International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR) Conference, Delft.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. S., and Lee, H. (2021), “Process Characteristics of Product-Service Systems Development: Comparison of Seven Manufacturing Company Cases”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.286. 1 March 2021, 124971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.S. and Park, J.A. (2021), “Design Thinking in the Framework of Visual Thinking and Characterization of Service Design Ideation Methods Using Visual Reasoning Model”, The Design Journal, Vol. 24, Issue 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. S., Kim, M. H., and Jin, S. T. (2005), “Cognitive Characteristics and Design Creativity: an Experimental Study”, Proc. ASME Conf. Design Theory and Methodology, Long Beach.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.S., Shin, J.H., and Shin, Y.K. (2010), “Conceptual Design and Cognitive Elements of Creativity: Toward Personalized Learning Supports for Design Creativity”, In: Taura, T., Nagai, Y. (eds) Design Creativity, 2010. Springer, London.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.S., Hong, Y.K., Kim, J.H. and Kim, Y.M. (2011), “Context-Specific Experience Sampling for Experience Design Research”, International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED11), Copenhagen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.S., Jin, S.T., and Lee, S.W. (2011), “Relations between Design Activities and Personal Creativity Modes”, Journal of Engineering Design, 22:4, 235–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. S., Jeong, J. Y., Hong, Y. K., and Hong, S. J. (2020), “A Schema for Systematic Service Imagining: Context-Based Activity Modeling”, Sustainability, 12(22).Google Scholar
Kim, Y.S., Lee, S.W., Jeong, H., Kim, S.R., Kim, J.H., Noh, J.H., and Won, J.H. (2013), “A Systematic Design Framework for Product-Service Systems and Its Implementation”, International Conference on Service Science and Innovation, Kaohsiung.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.W., Lee, J., Jo, N., Kim, Y.S. (2013), “Design Activity and Team Interaction Characteristics: a Case Study of Protocol Analysis on Team-based Product-Service Systems Design Processes”, International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13), Seoul.Google Scholar
Önal, N.F., and Şener-Pedgley, B. (2019), “Using a Self-Reporting Tool to Capture Design Student's Experience”, DRS International Conference for Design Education Researchers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pine, J.B. II, and Gilmore, J.H. (1998), Welcome to the Experience Economy, Harvard Business Review, 97–105.Google Scholar
Shimomura, Y., Nemoto, Y., and Kimita, K. A. (2015), “A Method for Analysing Conceptual Design Process of Product-Service Systems”, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Volume 64, Issue 1, pp.145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tukker, A. (2015), “Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – A review”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 76–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargo, S. L., and Lusch, R. F. (2004), “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing”, Journal of Marketing, 68, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, D. J. (2009), Teamology: the Construction and Organization of Effective Teams. London: Springer.Google Scholar