Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:54:20.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survey of Model-Based Design Reviews: Practices & Challenges?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

R. Pinquié ,
V. Romero  and
F. Noel
R. Pinquié*
Affiliation:
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, France
V. Romero
Affiliation:
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, France
F. Noel
Affiliation:
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, France
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The design of large-scale engineered systems relies on the extensive use of models. Although there are few papers that study design review practices, we did not find any on model-based design reviews. Thus, we undertook a survey to collect current practices and challenges. We found that reviews are mainly synchronous co-located or remote meetings that involve various profiles who need to access and share models, but that they pragmatically give them up and prefer to comment on PowerPoint-like slides containing screenshots of models except when the meeting gathers only experts in model-based design.

Keywords

model-based systems engineering (MBSE)design reviewdesign practicedesign models
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 1945 - 1954
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Aromaa, S. (2017), “Virtual prototyping in design reviews of industrial systems”, Proceedings of the 21st International Academic Mindtrek Conference, Vol. 2017-Janua, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 110–119.Google Scholar
Aromaa, S., Leino, S.P., Viitaniemi, J., Jokinen, L. and Kiviranta, S. (2012), “Benefits of the use of virtual environments in product design review meeting”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, Vol. DS 70, pp. 355–364.Google Scholar
Averbukh, V., Averbukh, N., Vasev, P., Gvozdarev, I., Levchuk, G., Melkozerov, L. and Mikhaylov, I. (2019), “Metaphors for Software Visualization Systems Based on Virtual Reality”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 11613 LNCS, pp. 60–70.Google Scholar
Baduel, R., Chami, M., Bruel, J.M. and Ober, I. (2018), “SysML models verification and validation in an industrial context: Challenges and experimentation”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 10890 LNCS, pp. 132–146.Google Scholar
Bayer, T. (2018), “Is MBSE helping? Measuring value on Europa Clipper”, IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2018-March, IEEE, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Bone, M.A., Blackburn, M.R., Rhodes, D.H., Cohen, D.N. and Guerrero, J.A. (2019), “Transforming systems engineering through digital engineering”, Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., Zucco, G. and Olechowski, A. (2019), “A survey of design reviews: Understanding differences by designer-roles and phase of development”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, Vol. 2019-Augus No. August, pp. 2745–2754.Google Scholar
Gericke, K., Eckert, C., Campean, F., Clarkson, P.J., Flening, E., Isaksson, O., Kipouros, T., et al. (2020), “Supporting designers: moving from method menagerie to method ecosystem”, Design Science, Vol. 6, p. e21.Google Scholar
Herzog, E., Hallonquist, J. and Naeser, J. (2014), “4.5.1 Systems Modeling with SysML - an experience report”, INCOSE International Symposium, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 600–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, E., Pandikow, A. and Ab, S. (2005), “SysML – an Assessment”, INCOSE International Symposium, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 293–305.Google Scholar
Huet, G., Culley, S.J., McMahon, C.A. and Fortin, C. (2007), “Making sense of engineering design review activities”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberhauser, R. and Lecon, C. (2017), “Immersed in Software Structures: A Virtual Reality Approach”, Tenth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI 2017), pp. 181–186.Google Scholar
Romero, V., Pinquié, R. and Noël, F. (2021), “An immersive virtual environment for reviewing model-centric designs”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 1 No. August, pp. 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, A., Nafeie, L., Baranowski, A., Seipel, P. and Misiak, M. (2019), “Visualization of Software Architectures in Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality”, 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference, IEEE, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Verlinden, J., Horváth, I. and Nam, T.-J. (2009), “Recording augmented reality experiences to capture design reviews”, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 189–200.Google Scholar
Walden, D.D., Roedler, G.J., Forsberg, K., Hamelin, R.D., Shortell, T.M. and International Council on Systems Engineering. (2015), Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities.Google Scholar
Wolfartsberger, J. (2019), “Analyzing the potential of Virtual Reality for engineering design review”, Automation in Construction, Vol. 104, pp. 27–37.Google Scholar