Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:03:40.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SIMULATION-BASED PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS FOR FUTURE ROBUST MODULAR PRODUCT ARCHITECTURES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Florian M. Dambietz ,
Erik Greve  and
Dieter Krause
Florian M. Dambietz*
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology
Erik Greve
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology
Dieter Krause
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology
*
Seiler, Florian Michael, Hamburg University of Technology, PKT, Germany, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The increased demand for customer-adapted product solutions shows an increasing trend of product variety, leading to an increased internal variety and therefore -costs. The concept of modularization provides apossible solution to this challenge by developing modular kits. Nevertheless, modularization methods to not lead to one individual modular kit, but to several alternatives. The decision of which alternative to implement can be crucial to the applying companys succes. During this decision-making both customer- and company perspectives need to be taken into account. This contribution is to present a simulation-based approach to support the decision making by using a model-based configuration system. Furthermore, as classical decision-making processes are based upon historical data, future aspects are usually not taken into account. In order to counteract this situation, this contribution intends to simulate as well future aspects impacting the modular product architecture. In this case, the simulation is used in order to evaluate the individual performances of a Design-for-Variety product architecture as opposed to a Design-for-Future-Robustness by applying this method to the example of customer-individual laser machines.

Keywords

SimulationDesign for Future-RobustnessProduct architectureConfigurationConstraint modelling
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 2671 - 2680
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Bauer, W. (2016), Planung und Entwicklung änderungsrobuster Plattformarchitekturen, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München.Google Scholar
Cicconi, P.; Raffaeli, R.; Marchionne, M.; Germani, M. (2018): A model-based simulation approach to support the product configuration and optimization of gas turbine ducts, Computer-Aided Design & Applications, Vol. 15, pp. 807–818, https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2018.1462564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, A. and Siebe, A. (2016), Szenario Management: Von strategischem Vorausdenken zu zukunftsrobusten Entscheidungen, Campus, Frankfurt a. M., Germany.Google Scholar
Greve, E. and Krause, D. (2018), “An Assessment of Methods to support the design of future robust modular product architectures”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 335–346. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, E.; Fuchs, C.; Hamraz, B.; Windheim, M.; Krause, D. (2021), “Design for future Variety to enable long-term Benefits of Modular Product Families”, 23rd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Gothenburg, Sweden, August 16–20.Google Scholar
Hackl, J., Krause, D., Otto, K., Windheim, M., Moon, S.K., Bursac, N. and Lachmayer, R. (2020), “Impact of Modularity Decisions on a Firm's Economic Objectives”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 142 No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, T. J. Y.; Otto, K.; Wood, K. L. (2016): Design Concept Screening in Compex System Using Component Constraints, Proceedings of the International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC 2016), Charlotte, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Krause, D. and Gebhardt, N. (2018): Methodische Entwicklung modularer Produktfamilien, Springer, Berlin, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53040-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipp, T. and Krause, D. (2008), “Design for Variety: Efficient Support for Design Engineers”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 425–432.Google Scholar
Kovalenko, I.; Tilbury, D.; Barton, K. (2019): The model-based product agent: A control oriented architecture for intelligent products in multi-agent manufacturing systems, Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 86, pp. 105–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvador, F. (2007), “Towards a product system modularity construct: Literature review and reconceptualization”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 54 No. 2. https://dx.doi/org/10.1109/TEM.2007.893996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seiler, F. M. and Krause, D. (2020a): A Multi-Dimensional Configuration Algorithm for Modular Product Architectures, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Vol. 1, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 2405–2414. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seiler, F. M.; Kuhl, J.; Krause, D. (2020b): A Simulation-Based Decision Support Method For Modular Product Architecture Alternatives, 22nd International Dependency and Structure Modeling Conference (DSM 2020), Cambridge, MA, USA, https://doi.org/10.35199/dsm2020.9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stjepandic, J.; Wognum, N.; Verhagen, W. (2015): Concurrent Engineering in the 21st Century: Foundations, Developments and Challenges, Springer International, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13776-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zennaro, I.; Finco, S.; Battini, D.; Persona, A. (2019): Big size highly customised product manufacturing systems: a literature review and future research agenda, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 57 (15-16), pp. 5362–5385, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1582819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar