No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Rethinking System Boundaries for Better Utilisation of Additive Manufacturing Potentials – A Case Study
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2022
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The potentials of additive manufacturing for objectives such as lightweight construction are not yet fully exploited. In this paper, the possibilities of integrative function and system modelling for this challenge will be discussed. In a design study, a triathlon trailer is designed considering the constraints of AM. A suitable system boundary is to be detected using the one-part device method. The findings of the study will help to understand in which form methods such as functional modelling can be applied or adapted for the application of additive manufacturing.
Keywords
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2022.
References
Bales, J., Bales, K., Baugh, L. and Tokish, J. (2012), “Evaluation for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow in ironman triathletes: Physical examination and electrodiagnostic evidence”, Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, available at: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3182427003.Google Scholar
Bender, B. and Gericke, K. (2021), Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre 9. Auflage 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beuth. (2015), “DIN EN ISO 4210-5: Cycles - Safety requirements for bicycles - Part 5: Steering test methods”, available at: https://www.beuth.de/de/norm/din-en-iso-4210-5/199132868 (accessed 12 November 2021).Google Scholar
Borgue, O., Müller, J., Leicht, A., Panarotto, M. and Isaksson, O. (2019), “Constraint replacement-based design for additive manufacturing of satellite components: Ensuring design manufacturability through tailored test artefacts”, Aerospace, MDPI Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Vol. 6 No. 11.Google Scholar
Borgue, O., Muller, J., Panarotto, M. and Isaksson, O. (2018), “Function modelling and constraints replacement to support design for additive manufacturing of satellite components”, Proceedings of NordDesign: Design in the Era of Digitalization, NordDesign 2018.Google Scholar
Borgue, O., Panarotte, M., Müller, J.R. and Isaksson, O. (2018), “Function modelling and constraints replacement to support design for additive manufacturing of satellite components / The Design Society”, available at: https://www.designsociety.org/publication/40871/Function+modelling+and+constraints+replacement+to+support+design+for+additive+manufacturing+of+satellite+components (accessed 19 October 2021.Google Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K. (1994), “Theory of Technical Systems”, Journal of Engineering Design, available at: 10.1080/09544829408907877.Google Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K., Kiewert, A. and Lindemann, U. (2007), Cost-Efficient Design, Cost-Efficient Design, available at: 10.1007/978-3-540-34648-7.Google Scholar
Eisenbart, B., Gericke, K., Blessing, L.T.M. and McAloone, T.C. (2017), “A DSM-based framework for integrated function modelling: concept, application and evaluation”, Research in Engineering Design, available at: 10.1007/s00163-016-0228-1.Google Scholar
Eisenbart, B., Qureshi, A., Gericke, K. and Blessing, L. (2013), “Integrating Different Functional Modeling Perspectives”, available at: 10.1007/978-81-322-1050-4_7.Google Scholar
Galvin, P. and Morkel, A. (2001), “The effect of product modularity on industry structure: The case of the world bicycle industry”, Industry and Innovation, available at: 10.1080/13662710120034392.Google Scholar
Gumpinger, T., Jonas, J. and Krause, D. (2009), “New approach for lightweight design: from differential design to integration of function”, Internation Conference on Engineering Design, ICED`09, pp. 6–201–6–210.Google Scholar
Hubka, V. and Eder, W.E. (1988), Theory of Technical Systems, Theory of Technical Systems, available at: 10.1007/978-3-642-52121-8.Google Scholar
Johannesson, H. and Claesson, A. (2005), “Systematic product platform design: A combined function-means and parametric modeling approach”, Journal of Engineering Design, available at: 10.1080/09544820512331325247.Google Scholar
Kyle, C.R. and Burke, E. (1984), “Improving the racing bicycle.”, Mechanical Engineering.Google Scholar
Lachmayer, R. and Lippert, R.B. (2020), Entwicklungsmethodik Für Die Additive Fertigung, Entwicklungsmethodik Für Die Additive Fertigung, available at: 10.1007/978-3-662-59789-7.Google Scholar
Mercado Rojas, J.G., Tamayo, E., Wolfe, T., Fleck, B. and Qureshi, A.J. (2019), “Design modeling for additive manufacturing in the case study of a systematic methodology applied to plasma transferred arc additive manufacturing”, Procedia CIRP, available at: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.198.Google Scholar
Müller, J.R., Isaksson, O., Landahl, J., Raja, V., Panarotto, M., Levandowski, C. and Raudberget, D. (2019), “Enhanced function-means modeling supporting design space exploration”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM, available at: 10.1017/S0890060419000271.Google Scholar
Müller, J.R., Siiskonen, M.D.I. and Malmqvist, J. (2020), “LESSONS LEARNED from the APPLICATION of ENHANCED FUNCTION-MEANS MODELLING”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 1325–1334.Google Scholar
Ponche, R., Hascoet, J.Y., Kerbrat, O. and Mognol, P. (2018), “A new global approach to design for additive manufacturing: A method to obtain a design that meets specifications while optimizing a given additive manufacturing process is presented in this paper”, Additive Manufacturing Handbook: Product Development for the Defense Industry, available at: 10.1080/17452759.2012.679499.Google Scholar
Santos, A.V.F. and Silveira, Z.C. (2021), “Design for assistive technology oriented to design methodology: a systematic review on user-centered design and 3D printing approaches”, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, available at: 10.1007/s40430-021-03184-1.Google Scholar
Schmitt, P. and Gericke, K. (2020), “Factors influencing the de Desicion of conventional/hybrid Lightweight Design Strategies and their Effect on the Design Process”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 1, pp. 1095–1104.Google Scholar
Schmitt, P., Zorn, S. and Gericke, K. (2021), “Additive Manufacturing Research Landscape: a Literature Review”, Additive Manufacturing Research Landscape: A Literature Review.Google Scholar
Valjak, F. and Bojčetić, N. (2019), “Conception of design principles for additive manufacturing”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, available at: 10.1017/dsi.2019.73.Google Scholar
Valjak, F. and Lindwall, A. (2021), “Review of Design Heuristics and Design Principles in Design for Additive Manufacturing”, Proceedings of the Design Society, available at: 10.1017/pds.2021.518.Google Scholar
Wurnitsch, W., Siebert, M., Litzenberger, S. and Sabo, A. (2010), “Development of an individually customizable integral carbon aerobar based on sEMG measurements of the upper limbs”, Procedia Engineering, available at: 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.043.Google Scholar
Yang, S. and Zhao, Y.F. (2016), “Conceptual design for assembly in the context of additive manufacturing”, Solid Freeform Fabrication 2016: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium - An Additive Manufacturing Conference, SFF 2016, No. October, pp. 1932–1944.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access