Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:27:05.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RELATIONS BETWEEN COGNITIVE ABILITY AND CREATIVE DESIGN QUALITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Yuan Yin  and
Peter Childs
Yuan Yin*
Affiliation:
Dyson School of Design Engieering, Imperial College London
Peter Childs
Affiliation:
Dyson School of Design Engieering, Imperial College London
*
YIN, Yuan, Imperial College London, United Kingdom, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The study aims to identify the relations between creative design quality and content of the memorising precedents, association, and combination of information processes in a design context. 71 participants were recruited to finish a creative design task. Think aloud and interview were conducted during and after the creative design task to understand the content of the memorising precedents, association, and combination of information processes. The 71 creative designs were then assessed by five experts in creative design. The results from this study revealed that participants who generated high-creativity design tend to memorize various topic-related precedents, associate items based on topic-related information, and combine topic-related information with products. Participants who generated low-creativity design tend to memorize characteristics of a specific space of the design topic, associate items based on specific topic-related information, and add the topic-related pattern to a product.

Keywords

CreativityDesign cognitionDesign process
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 3055 - 3064
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Amabile, T. M. (1982). “Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique”, Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 43, No.5, pp. 997. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (2018). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J. (1991). “Generality of creativity across performance domains”, Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). “Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products”, Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1601_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beda, Z., Smith, S. M., & Orr, J. (2020). “Creativity on demand–Hacking into creative problem solving”, NeuroImage, Vol. 216, pp. 116867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116867CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childs, P., Han, J., Chen, L., Jiang, P., Wang, P., Park, D., & Vilanova, …, I. (2022). “The creativity diamond—A framework to aid creativity”, Journal of Intelligence, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp.73. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040073CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiaans, H. H. (2002). “Creativity as a design criterion”, Communication Research Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1401_4Google Scholar
Chrysikou, E. G., Motyka, K., Nigro, C., Yang, S. I., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2016). “Functional fixedness in creative thinking tasks depends on stimulus modality”, Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 425. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross, N. (2021). Engineering design methods: strategies for product design, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Dubberly, H. (2004). How do you design. A compendium of models.Google Scholar
Hu, Y., Du, X., Bryan-Kinns, N., & Guo, Y. (2019). “Identifying divergent design thinking through the observable behavior of service design novices”, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Vol.29, No.5, pp. 1179–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9479-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2008). “A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the consensual assessment technique”, Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802059929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, E., & Kim, K. (2015). “Cognitive styles in design problem solving: Insights from network-based cognitive maps”, Design Studies, Vol. 40, pp.1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houzangbe, S., Masson, D., Fleury, S., Gómez Jáuregui, D. A., Legardeur, J., Richir, S., & Couture, N. (2022). “Is virtual reality the solution? A comparison between 3D and 2D creative sketching tools in the early design process”, Frontiers in Virtual Reality, Vol. 3, pp. 3:958223. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.958223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. (1982). “Using the” thinking-aloud” method in cognitive interface design”, Yorktown Heights, NY: IBM TJ Watson Research Center.Google Scholar
Liu, Q., Wang, K., Li, Y. & Liu, Y. (2020). “Data-driven concept network for inspiring designers’ idea generation”, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, Vol. 20, No.3. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, J., Sarica, S. & Wood, K.L. (2021). “Guiding data-driven design ideation by knowledge distance”, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 218, pp. 106873. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, A. T., McComb, C., & Toh, C. A. (2020, August). “Towards an understanding of semantic memory during idea generation”, In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. 83921, pp. V003T03A017. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/DETC2020-22577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peskin, J., & Ellenbogen, B. (2019). “Cognitive processes while writing poetry: An expert-novice study”, Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp.232–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1570931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, M., & Lu, J. (2018). “A quick look at NVivo”, Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp.104–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2018.1465535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2011). “Assessing design creativity”, Design studies, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 348–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, J. J., Millsap, R. E., Woodward, J., & Smith, S. M. (2012). Applied tests of design skills—part 1: divergent thinking.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E. (1984). “Precis of elements of episodic memory”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 223–238. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0004440X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, W. W., & Chiu, C. Y. (2002). “Effects of novel conceptual combination on creativity”, The Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol.36, No.4, pp. 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01066.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkenfeld, M. J., & Ward, T. B. (2001). “Similarity and emergence in conceptual combination”, Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, S., Shen, D., Zhang, E., & Bao, D. (2020, December). “Tradeoff between Episodic and Semantic Precedents in creative design”, In 2020 13th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design (ISCID), pp. 230–233, IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ISCID51228.2020.00058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, Y, Wang, P and Childs, PRN (2022) “Understanding creativity process through electroencephalography measurement on creativity-related cognitive factors”, Front. Neurosci. Vol.16, pp.951272. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.951272CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, Y., Han, J., Huang, S., Zuo, H., & Childs, P. (2021). “A study on student: assessing four creativity assessment methods in product design”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Vol. 1, pp. 263–272. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar