No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Relation between purpose of individual agile elements and the need for their adaptation in product design & development
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Empirical studies show that adaptations of existing agile methods are necessary for developing physical products creating obstacles and challenges. This paper aggregates the gathered findings from several cross-sectional industry surveys and establishes a relationship between the extent of utilization of individual agile elements based on Scrum and the need to adapt these elements in applying agile procedural models. The emphasis of examination resides in the purpose perspective of agile elements with the aim of facilitating context-specific adaptations more effectively.
- Type
- Design Organisation, Collaboration and Management
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2024.
References
Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Müller, J. and Spadinger, M. (2019) “Agility and its Features in Mechatronic System Development: A Systematic Literature Review”, in ISPIM Innovation Conference (30th ISPIM), Florenz.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Trost, S. and Spadinger, M. (2020) “Alignment of the change to agile through method-supported evaluation of agile principles in physical product development”, Procedia CIRP, 91, 600–614, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atzberger, A., Nicklas, S., Schrof, J., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2020) Agile Entwicklung physischer Produkte - Eine Studie zum aktuellen Stand in der industriellen Praxis, München: University of the German Federal Armed Forces, http://dx.doi.org/10.18726/2020_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M. (1994) A process-based approach to computer-supported engineering design, unpublished thesis (Doctoral), University of Twente.Google Scholar
Conforto, E.C. and Amaral, D.C. (2016) “Agile project management and stage-gate model—A hybrid framework for technology-based companies”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 40, 1–14, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresch, A., Pacheco Lacerda, D. and Valle Antunes, J. Jr (2015) Design Science Research: A Method for Science and Technology Advancement, Schweiz: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gericke, K., Eckert, C., Campean, F., Clarkson, P.J., Flening, E., Isaksson, O., Kipouros, T., Kokkolaras, M., Köhler, C., Panarotto, M. and Wilmsen, M. (2020) “Supporting designers: moving from method menagerie to method ecosystem”, Design Science, 6, e21, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gericke, K., Meißner, M. and Paetzold, K. (2013) “Understanding the context of product development”, in Lindemann, U., Srinivasan, V., Kim, S. Y., Lee, S. W. C., John, and Cascini, G., eds., International Conference on Engineering Design ICED13, Seoul, Design Society, 191–200.Google Scholar
Haberfellner, R., de Weck, O., Fricke, E. and Vössner, S. (2019) Systems Engineering - Fundamentals and Applications, Birkhäuser Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hales, C. and Gooch, S. (2004) Managing Engineering Design, Second ed., London, Berlin, Heidelberb: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimicke, J., Ng, G.-L., Krüger, M. and Albers, A. (2021) “A systematic for realizing agile principles in the process of mechatronic systems development through individual selection of suitable process models, methods and practices”, in 31st CIRP Design Conference 2021 (CIRP Design 2021), Online, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimicke, J., Niever, M., Zimmermann, V., Klippert, M., Marthaler, F. and Albers, A. (2019) “Comparison of Existing Agile Approaches in the Context of Mechatronic System Development: Potentials and Limits in Implementation”, in Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 2199-2208, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hevner, A. (2007) “A Three Cycle View of Design Science Research”, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19.Google Scholar
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J. and Ram, S. (2004) “Design Science in Information Systems Research”, MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25148625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalides, M., Bursac, N., Nicklas, S.J., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2023a) “Analyzing current Challenges on Scaled Agile Development of Physical Products”, Procedia CIRP, 119, 1188–1197, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalides, M., Bursac, N., Nicklas, S.J., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2023b) “Why Companies Scale Agile Development of Physical Products: An Empirical Study” in Chakrabarti, A. and Singh, V., eds., Design in the Era of Industry 4.0 - Volume 3 Springer, Singapore, 1163–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0428-0_95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalides, M., Nicklas, S.J., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2022) Agile Entwicklung physischer Produkte: Eine Studie zum aktuellen Stand in der industriellen Praxis, Neubiberg: Universität der Bundeswehr München, http://dx.doi.org/10.18726/2022_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicklas, S.J., Atzberger, A., Briede-Westermeyer, J.C. and Paetzold, K. (2020) “The User-Driven Minimum Feasible Product – Towards a Novel Approach on User Integration”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, 1, 1495–1504, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.49.Google Scholar
Nicklas, S.J., Michalides, M., Atzberger, A., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2021) Agile Entwicklung physischer Produkte - Eine Studie zum Stand in der industriellen Praxis während der COVID-19-Pandemie, München: University of the German Federal Armed Forces, http://dx.doi.org/10.18726/2021_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orejuela, S., Motte, D. and Johansson, G. (2023) “Manager´s understanding of Agile in Hardware Development”, Proceedings of the Design Society, 3, 2515–2524, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ovesen, N. (2012) The Challgenes of Becoming Agile: Implementing and conducting Scrum in Integrated Product Development, unpublished thesis (Doctoral), Aalborg University.Google Scholar
Ovesen, N. and Sommer, A.F. (2015) “Scrum in the Traditional Development Organization: Adapting to the Legacy”, in Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 87–99, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44009-4_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paetzold, K. (2017) “Product and Systems Engineering/CA* Tool Chains” in Biffl, S., Lüder, A. and Gerhard, D., eds., Multi-Disciplinary Engineering for Cyber-Physical Production Systems: Data Models and Software Solutions for Handling Complex Engineering Projects, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 27–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56345-9_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paetzold, K. (2022) “Data and Information Flow Design in Product Development” in Krause, D. and Heyden, E., eds., Design Methodology for Future Products: Data Driven, Agile and Flexible, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 201–218, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78368-6_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papalambros, P.Y. (2015) “Design Science: Why, What and How”, Design Science, 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2015.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendzik, M., Sembdner, P. and Paetzold, K. (2023) “Identification and Classification of Uncertainties as the Foundation of Agile Methods”, Proceedings of the Design Society, 3, 2165–2174, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, T.S., Atzberger, A., Gerling, C., Schrof, J., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2019) Agile Development of Physical Products - An Empirical Study about Potentials, Transition and Applicability, München: University of the German Federal Armed Forces,Google Scholar
Schmidt, T.S., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2018a) Agile Development of Physical Products - An Empirical Study about Motivations, Potentials and Applicability München: University of the German Federal Armed Forces,Google Scholar
Schmidt, T.S., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2018b) “Expected Vs. Real Effects of Agile Development of Physical Products: Apportioning the Hype”, in Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, 2121–2132, http://dx.doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, G., Dölle, C. and Schloesser, S. (2018) “Agile Prototyping for technical systems - Towards an adaption of the Minimum Viable Product principle”, in NordDesign, Linköping.Google Scholar
Sutherland, J. and Schwaber, K. (2020) “The Scrum Guide - The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game”, https://scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2020/2020-Scrum-Guide-US.pdf#zoom=100.Google Scholar
Weiss, S., Michalides, M., Pendzik, M., Scharold, F., Stoiber, L. and Paetzold, K. (2023) Agile Entwicklung physischer Produkte 2023 - Eine Studie zum aktuellen Stand in der industriellen Praxis, Dresden, http://dx.doi.org/10.25368/2023.213.Google Scholar
Žužek, T., Kušar, J., Rihar, L. and Berlec, T. (2020) “Agile-Concurrent hybrid: A framework for concurrent product development using Scrum”, Concurrent Engineering, 28(4), 255–264, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1063293x20958541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access