Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:40:57.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

POTENTIAL MODEL - METHODICAL EVALUATION OF INDUSTRY 4.0 TECHNOLOGIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

David Schneider ,
Tobias Huth  and
Thomas Vietor
David Schneider*
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institute for Engineering Design
Tobias Huth
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institute for Engineering Design
Thomas Vietor
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institute for Engineering Design
*
Schneider, David Technische Universität Braunschweig Institute for Engineering Design Germany, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

With regard to the currently perceptible technological, social and economic change, also known as the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” or “Internet of Things”, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in particular are confronted with various obstacles in their attempt of keeping pace. For example, there is a lack of orientation of which I4.0 technology is suitable for a target-oriented application. Furthermore, the actual or potential effects of I4.0 can only be estimated insufficiently and SMEs are at a disadvantage compared to large companies due to lower monetary and personnel capacities. In this publication these obstacles on the way to become an I4.0 company are taken up and the core elements of a methodical solution approach in the form of the “Potential Model” are explained in detail. Thereby the Potential Model is intended to support SMES at the rough-quantitative evaluation of I4.0 and the development of I4.0 implementation strategies with minimal monetary and time-related efforts needed.

Keywords

Industry 4.0TechnologyEvaluationDesign methods
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 2429 - 2438
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Abramovici, M., Gebus, P. and Savarino, P. (2018) Engineering smarter Produkte und Services: Plattform Industrie 4.0 Studie [Online]. Available at https://www.plattform-i40.de/PI40/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/Publikation/hm-2018-fb-smart.html (Accessed 29 August 2020).Google Scholar
Andelfinger, V. P. and Hänisch, T. (2017) Industrie 4.0, Wiesbaden, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blunck, E. and Werthmann, H. (2017) Industry 4.0 - An Opportunity to Realize Sustainbale Manufacturing and its Potential for a Circular Economy [Online]. Available at https://hrcak.srce.hr/187419 (Accessed 22 July 2020).Google Scholar
Erdmann, M.-K. (2013) Supply chain performance measurement: Operative und strategische Management- und Controllingansätze, 3rd edn, Lohmar, Eul.Google Scholar
Erol, S., Schumacher, A. and Wilfried, S. (2016) ‘Strategic guidance towards Industry 4.0 – a three-stage process model’, International Conference on Competitive Manufacturing [Online]. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286937652_Strategic_guidance_towards_Industry_40_-_a_three-stage_process_model.Google Scholar
Faller, C. and Feldmüller, D. (2015) ‘Industry 4.0 Learning Factory for regional SMEs’, Procedia CIRP, vol. 32, pp. 88–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkermann, D., Schneider, D., Martin, N. L., Lembeck, H., Zhang, J. and Thiede, S. (2019) ‘A framework to classify Industry 4.0 technologies across production and product development’, Procedia CIRP, vol. 84, pp. 973–978 [Online]. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, V., Kuge, S., Geissbauer, R. and Schrauf, S. (2014) Industrie 4.0 - Chancen und Herausforderungen der vierten industriellen Revolution [Online]. Available at https://www.kantaremnid.de/studien/pdf/pwc_studie_industrie_4.0.pdf (Accessed 22 August 2020).Google Scholar
Lindemann, U. (2016) Handbuch Produktentwicklung, München, Hanser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matt, D. T., Modrák, V. and Zsifkovits, H. (2020) Industry 4.0 for SMEs, Cham, Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Digital, McKinsey (2015) How to navigate digitization of the manufacturing sector [Online]. Available at https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/industry-four-point-o-how-to-navigae-the-digitization-of-the-manufacturing-sector (Accessed 24 July 2020).Google Scholar
Pereira, A. C. and Romero, F. (2017) ‘A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept’, Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 13, pp. 1206–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A. (2016) Einführung und Umsetzung von Industrie 4.0, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, D. (2021) Industrie 4.0 Methoden- und Wissensplattform: Einführung und Basiswissen [Online]. Available at http://i40-selfmanagement.ik.ing.tu-bs.de/ (Accessed 2 March 2021).Google Scholar
Schneider, D., Huth, T., Vietor, T., Schumacher, P., Weckenborg, C. and Spengler, T. (2020) ‘Development of a potential model to support the assessment and introduction of Industry 4.0 technologies’, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, vol. 1, pp. 707–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, C. (2016) The challenges of industry 4.0 for small and medium-sized enterprises, Bonn, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Division for Economic and Social Policy.Google Scholar
Schuh, G., Riesener, M., Barg, S. and Mattern, C. (2017) ‘Handlungsfelder zur erfolgreichen Umsetzung von Industrie 4.0 in der F & E’, ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, vol. 112, 1-2, pp. 86–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sendler, U. (2016) Industrie 4.0 grenzenlos, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharafi, A. (2013) Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Wiesbaden, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terstegen, S., Hennegriff, S., Dander, H. and Adler, P. (2019) ‘Vergleichsstudie über Vorgehensmodelle zur Einführung und Umsetzung von Digitalisierungsmaßnahmen in der produzierenden Industrie’, in GfA (ed) Frühjahrskongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaften - Arbeit interdisziplinär analysieren – bewerten – gestalten, Dortmund.Google Scholar
Thielsch, M. T. and Brandenburg, T. (2012) Praxis der Wirtschaftspsychologie: Themen und Fallbeispiele für Studium und Anwendung, Münster, Westf, Monsenstein und Vannerdat.Google Scholar
Ulrich, K. T. and Eppinger, S. D. (2012) Product design and development, 5th edn, Boston, Mass., McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
Vaidya, S., Ambad, P. and Bhosle, S. (2018) ‘Industry 4.0 – A Glimpse’, Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 20, pp. 233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vajna, S. (2014) Integrated Design Engineering, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vietor, T., Herrmann, C. and Spengler, T. S., eds. (2015) Synergetische Produktentwicklung: Unternehmensübergreifend erfolgreich zusammenarbeiten ; Ergebnisse des Verbundprojekts SynProd, Aachen, Shaker.Google Scholar
Wichmann, R. L., Eisenbart, B. and Gericke, K. (2019) ‘The Direction of Industry: A Literature Review on Industry 4.0’, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2129–2138.Google Scholar