Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:29:15.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planning the Analysis of Use Phase Data in Product Planning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

M. Meyer ,
I. Wiederkehr ,
C. Koldewey  and
R. Dumitrescu
M. Meyer*
Affiliation:
Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Paderborn University, Germany
I. Wiederkehr
Affiliation:
Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Paderborn University, Germany
C. Koldewey
Affiliation:
Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Paderborn University, Germany
R. Dumitrescu
Affiliation:
Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Paderborn University, Germany Fraunhofer IEM, Germany
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The ongoing digitalization of products offers product managers new potentials to plan future product generations based on data from the use phase instead of assumptions. However, product managers often face difficulties in identifying promising opportunities for analyzing use phase data. In this paper, we propose a method for planning the analysis of use phase data in product planning. It leads product managers from the identification of promising investigation needs to the derivation of specific use cases. The application of the method is shown using the example of a manufacturing company.

Keywords

data-driven designearly design phaseproduct planningbig data analysisindustrial data analytics
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 753 - 762
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Albers, A., Bursac, N., Urbanec, J., Lüdcke, R. and Rachenkova, G. (2014), “Knowledge Management in Product Generation Development – an empirical study”, Design for X – Beiträge zum 25. DfX-Symposium, TUHH Universitätsbibliothek, Hamburg, Germany, pp. 13–24.Google Scholar
Balasubramanian, J., Beiker, S., Chauhan, S., Colombo, T., Hansson, F. et al. . (2016), Car data: paving the way to value-creating mobility: Perspectives on a new automotive business model, McKinsey&Company.Google Scholar
Bertoni, A. (2020), “Data-Driven Design in Concept Development: Systematic Review and Missed Opportunities”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Cavtat, Croatia, Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–110. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.4Google Scholar
Beverungen, D., Müller, O., Matzner, M., Mendling, J. and vom Brocke, Jan (2019), “Conceptualizing smart service systems”, Electronic Markets, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 7–18. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0270-5Google Scholar
Bosch-Sijtsema, P. and Bosch, J. (2015), “User Involvement throughout the Innovation Process in High-Tech Industries”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 793–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, P., Clinton, J., Kerber, R., Khabaza, T., Reinartz, T. et al. . (2000), “CRISP-DM 1.0 – Step-by-step data mining guide”, SPSS, Vol. 9.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.G. (1988), “Predevelopment activities determine new product success”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 237–247. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(88)90007-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.G. (2019), “The drivers of success in new-product development”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 76, pp. 36–47. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1986), “An Investigation into the New Product Process: Steps, Deficiencies, and Impact”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Q., Wellsandt, S., Hribernik, K. and Thoben, K.-D. (2021), “Understanding Users and Products in Product Development: The Application of Product Usage Information and its Challenges”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Gothenburg, Sweden, pp. 3299–3308.Google Scholar
Dumitrescu, R. et al. . (2021) Engineering in Germany – The status quo in business and science, a contribution to Advanced Systems Engineering. Paderborn, Germany.Google Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Dumitrescu, R., Kahl, S. and Nordsiek, D. (2011), “Integrative development of product and production system for mechatronic products”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 772–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Dumitrescu, R., Echterfeld, J., Pfänder, T., Steffen, D. et al. . (2019), Innovationen für die Märkte von morgen: Strategische Planung von Produkten, Dienstleistungen und Geschäftsmodellen, Carl Hanser Verlag, München.Google Scholar
Herstatt, C. and Verworn, B. (2004), “The ‘Fuzzy Front End’ of Innovation”, Bringing Technology and Innovation into the Boardroom, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 347–372. https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230512771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hevner, A., March, S.T. and Park, J. (2004), “Design Science in Information Systems Research”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 75–105.Google Scholar
Holler, M., Stoeckli, E., Uebernickel, F. and Brenner, W. (2016), “Towards Understanding closed-loop PLM: The Role of Product Usage Data for Product Development enabled by intelligent Properties”, BLED 2016 Proceedings, Bled, Slovenia, pp. 479–491.Google Scholar
Holler, M., Neiditsch, G., Uebernickel, F. and Brenner, W. (2017), “Digital Product Innovation in Manufacturing Industries – Towards a Taxonomy for Feedback-driven Product Development Scenarios”, Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, USA, pp. 4726–4735.Google Scholar
Hou, L. and Jiao, R.J. (2020), “Data-informed inverse design by product usage information: a review, framework and outlook”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, No. 31 Vol. 3, pp. 529–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Igba, J., Alemzadeh, K., Gibbons, P.M. and Henningsen, K. (2015), “A framework for optimising product performance through feedback and reuse of in-service experience”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 36, pp. 2–12. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2014.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. and Wilemon, D. (2002), “Focusing the fuzzy front-end in new product development”, R&D Management, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 269–279. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00259Google Scholar
Kiritsis, D. (2011), “Closed-loop PLM for intelligent products in the era of the Internet of things”, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 43 No. 5, pp. 479–501. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2010.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koen, P., Ajamian, G., Burkart, R., Clamen, A., Davidson, J. et al. . (2001), “Providing Clarity and A Common Language to the “Fuzzy Front End””, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreutzer, R. (2019), Methodik zur Bestimmung der Nutzenpotenziale von Felddaten cyber-physischer Systeme, [PhD Thesis], RWTH Aachen.Google Scholar
LaValle, S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Hopkins, M.S. and Kruschwitz, N. (2011), “Big Data, Analytics and the Path From Insights to Value”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 21–31.Google Scholar
Lueth, K.L., Patsioura, C., Williams, D.Z. and Kermani, Z.Z. (2016), Industrial Analytics 2016/2017: The current state of data analytics usage in industrial companies, Digital Analytics Association e.V. Germany (DAAG), IoT Analytics GmbH.Google Scholar
Meyer, M., Frank, M., Massmann, M., Wendt, N. and Dumitrescu, R. (2020), “Data-Driven Product Generation and Retrofit Planning”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 93, Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp. 965–970. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M., Panzner, M., Koldewey, C. and Dumitrescu, R. (2021), “Towards Identifying Data Analytics Use Cases in Product Planning”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 104, Athens, Greece, pp. 1179–1184. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M., Wiederkehr, I., Koldewey, C. and Dumitrescu, R. (2021), “Understanding Usage Data-Driven Product Planning: A Systematic Literature Review”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 21), Gothenburg, Sweden, pp. 3289–3298. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M., Wiederkehr, I., Panzner, M., Koldewey, C. and Dumitrescu, R. (2022), “A Reference Process Model for Usage Data-Driven Product Planning”, Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, USA, 6105–6114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., Smith, A. and Papadakos, P. (2014) Value proposition design: How to create products and services customers. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. and Grote, K.-H. (2007), Engineering design: A systematic approach, 3rd edn., Springer, London. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, K., Emblemsvåg, J., Bailey, R., Allen, J.K. and Mistree, F. (2000), “Validating Design Methods and Research: The Validation Square”, Proceedings of DETC ‘00, 2000 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, pp. 379–390.Google Scholar
Porter, M.E. and Heppelmann, J.E. (2014), “How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 92 No. 11, pp. 64–88.Google Scholar
Porter, M.E. and Heppelmann, J.E. (2015), “How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Companies”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 93 No. 10, pp. 96–114.Google Scholar
Reinhart, F. (2016), “Industrial Data Science - Data Science in der industriellen Anwendung”, Industrie 4.0 Management, Vol. 32 No. 6, pp. 27–30.Google Scholar
Steenstrup, K., Sallam, R., Eriksen, L. and Jacobson, S. (2014), Industrial Analytics Revolutionizes Big Data in the Digital Business, Gartner, Available at: https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/2826118/industrial-analytics-revolutionizes-big-data-in-the-digi (Accessed: 21 November 2020).Google Scholar
Terzi, S., Bouras, A., Dutta, D., Garetti, M. and Kiritsis, D. (2010), “Product lifecycle management – from its history to its new role”, International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 360–389.Google Scholar
Tyagi, S. (2003), “Using data analytics for greater profits”, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 12–14. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02756660310734938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (2016), Product design and development, 6th edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V., VDI/VDE 3714 Blatt 1 (2019): Implementation and operation of big data applications in the manufacturing industry – Implementation of big data projects, Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e. V., Beuth Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilberg, J., Triep, I., Hollauer, C. and Omer, M. (2017), “Big Data in product development: Need for a data strategy”, Proceedings of PICMET '17: Technology Management for Interconnected World, Portland State University, Portland, USA, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Wuest, T., Hribernik, K. and Thoben, K.-D. (2014), “Capturing, Managing and Sharing Product Information along the Lifecycle for Design Improvement”, Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Integrated Design Engineering, Magdeburg/Gommern, Germany, pp. 107–115.Google Scholar
Xu, Z., Frankwick, G.L. and Ramirez, E. (2016), “Effects of big data analytics and traditional marketing analytics on new product success: A knowledge fusion perspective”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69 No. 5, pp. 1562–1566. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar